Attention, polychronicity, and expertise in prospective memory performance: Programmers' vulnerability to habit intrusion error in multitasking

The paper examines prospective memory (ProM) in programmer multitasking and reports administration of a naturalistic atypical action. The study emphasizes on how attention, time orientation, and expertise affect ProM performance in multitasking among a group of computer science and engineering students (N=108). The results suggest that attention play a crucial role in multitasking and ProM performance with respect to whether or not a word display requires more attention to be devoted in monitoring and identifying it for an appropriate action. Polychrons exhibit lesser degree of ProM performance failure than monochrons whereas expertise does not have an effect. Finally, results show that out of overall ProM performance failure, habit intrusion errors comprise of 16.22% occurring 1.75 times in every 10 valid click responses of ProM task. Moreover, experts demonstrate a superior performance over novices in programming.

[1]  Richard F. Haase,et al.  Cognitive Correlates of Polychronicity , 1979 .

[2]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Time-related behaviour in multitasking situations , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[4]  Nicholas P. Vitalari,et al.  Differences Between Novice and Expert Systems Analysts: What Do We Know and What Do We Do? , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Programming Problem Representation in Novice and Expert Programmers , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[6]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Towards an Understanding of the Role of Experience in the Evolution from Novice to Expert , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  Aljoscha C. Neubauer,et al.  Superior performance and neural efficiency: The impact of intelligence and expertise , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[8]  H. Aarts,et al.  Habit Formation and Multiple Means to Goal Attainment: Repeated Retrieval of Target Means Causes Inhibited Access to Competitors , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[9]  James Reason,et al.  Human Error , 1990 .

[10]  N. Shadbolt,et al.  Eliciting Knowledge from Experts: A Methodological Analysis , 1995 .

[11]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[12]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework , 2000 .

[13]  Laura Marie Leventhal,et al.  Why software testing is sometimes ineffective: two applied studies of positive test strategy , 1994 .

[14]  C. Kaufman,et al.  Exploring More Than 24 Hours a Day: A Preliminary Investigation of Polychronic Time Use , 1991 .

[15]  F. Gobet,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[16]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[17]  R. Marsh,et al.  Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  J. D. Lindquist.  Time management and polychronicity Comparisons , contrasts , and insights for the workplace , 1998 .

[19]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[20]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Does the central bottleneck encompass voluntary selection of hedonically based choices? , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[21]  Key Dismukes,et al.  Concurrent Task Management and Prospective Memory: Pilot Error as a Model for the Vulnerability of Experts , 2006 .

[22]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time , 1992 .

[23]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Attention: From Theory to Practice , 2006 .

[24]  D. Damos.  Multiple-task performance , 2020 .

[25]  Richard L. Frei,et al.  The impact of monochronic and Type A behavior patterns on research productivity and stress , 1999 .

[26]  F. Craik,et al.  Influences on the efficiency of prospective memory in younger and older adults. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[27]  S. L. Richardson,et al.  Aging and prospective memory: examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Marie-odile Bes,et al.  A case study of a human error in a dynamic environment , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[29]  T. Shallice,et al.  The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work‐unit polychronicity , 1999 .

[31]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[32]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[33]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Improving problem solving and creativity through use of complex-dynamic simulations , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  D. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Expertise in Software Design , 2006 .

[36]  Roger Remington,et al.  Prospective memory in dynamic environments: Effects of load, delay, and phonological rehearsal , 2001, Memory.

[37]  P W Burgess,et al.  Strategy application disorder: the role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking , 2000, Psychological research.

[38]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture , 1999 .

[39]  Peter Suedfeld,et al.  Personality theory and information processing , 1971 .

[40]  J. Ellis,et al.  Retrieval Cue Specificity and the Realization of Delayed Intentions , 1996 .

[41]  R. Proctor,et al.  Attention: Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[42]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[43]  Carol Kaufman–Scarborough,et al.  The Polychronic—Monochronic Tendency Model , 2007 .

[44]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Category Norms: An Updated and Expanded Version of the Battig and Montague (1969) Norms. , 2004 .

[45]  Carol Kaufman–Scarborough,et al.  Time management and polychronicity , 1999 .

[46]  Jon B. Holbrook,et al.  Human Memory and Cockpit Operations: An Asrs Study , 2003 .

[47]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognition, Technology & Work: An Introduction , 1999, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[48]  O. U. Vortac,et al.  Functions of external cues in prospective memory. , 1995, Memory.

[49]  K. Dismukes,et al.  Prospective Memory, Concurrent Task Management, and Pilot Error , 2007 .

[50]  Françoise Détienne,et al.  Design Strategies and Knowledge in Object-Oriented Programming: Effects of Experience , 1995, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[51]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Prospective Memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field , 2007 .

[52]  C. Bishop-Clark,et al.  Cognitive style, personality, and computer programming , 1995 .