Forces applied with a hoof tester to cadaver feet vary widely between users

Hoof testers are commonly used in equine practice. In this study, we determined the intraoperator and interoperator reliability of force application with hoof testers for different groups: experienced veterinarians, novices and farriers. For this purpose, we have developed and validated an instrumented hoof tester. Forces varied significantly between the different regions of the foot for experienced operators applying the highest forces to the heels, then the frog, then the toe, and the lowest forces to the quarters. Novices applied significantly more force to the toe versus the frog. Intraoperator reliability varied significantly between regions and operators. Novices had the narrowest width of limits of agreement for the frog and heel, but the widest for the toe and the quarters, whereas farriers had the narrowest width of agreement for the toe and quarter. Force application differed significantly between groups for the frog and heel regions, but not the toe and quarters. Veterinarians applied higher forces to the frog compared with farriers and novices, and higher forces to the heel compared with novices. This study showed that hoof tester forces vary widely within and between operators, and standardisation of hoof tester use is needed to make this diagnostic test more reliable.

[1]  S. Dyson,et al.  Lameness associated with foot pain: results of magnetic resonance imaging in 199 horses (January 2001--December 2003) and response to treatment. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[2]  D. Pfeiffer,et al.  Days lost from training by two- and three-year-old Thoroughbred horses: a survey of seven UK training yards. , 2008, Equine veterinary journal.

[3]  R. Dabareiner,et al.  Diagnosis, treatment, and farriery for horses with chronic heel pain. , 2003, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice.

[4]  C. Pollitt.  The anatomy and physiology of the hoof wall , 1998 .

[5]  P. R. van Weeren,et al.  Variations in the force applied to flexion tests of the distal limb of horses , 1997, Veterinary Record.

[6]  Thomas W. Bartel,et al.  Force Measurement Services at NIST: Equipment, Procedures, and Uncertainty | NIST , 1997 .

[7]  M. A. Collier,et al.  Balancing the normal foot: hoof preparation, shoe fit and shoe modification in the performance horse , 1997 .

[8]  J. Thomason,et al.  The modulus of elasticity of equine hoof wall: implications for the mechanical function of the hoof. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  S. Kamerling,et al.  Evaluation of detomidine-induced analgesia in horses with chronic hoof pain. , 1996, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[10]  S. Kamerling,et al.  Effects of ketoprofen and phenylbutazone on chronic hoof pain and lameness in the horse. , 1995, Equine veterinary journal.

[11]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[12]  V. Molony,et al.  Quantitative assessment of increased sensitivity of chronic laminitic horses to hoof tester evoked pain. , 2011, Equine veterinary journal.

[13]  A. Parks.  Examination of the Equine Foot , 2010 .

[14]  T. Stashak,et al.  Adams' Lameness in Horses , 1987 .