Focusing on health information: how to assess information quality on the internet

The quality of information on the internet is extremely variable. In health information, where quality can mean the difference between effective management of a health problem and potentially dangerous treatments, tools to assess quality are imperative. The criteria included in quality assessment tools are discussed. An overview of a study using one of these tools is provided.

[1]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Stefano Mizzaro,et al.  Relevance: The Whole History , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Petra Wilson,et al.  How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  H Bower,et al.  Internet sees growth of unverified health claims , 1996, BMJ.

[5]  Peiling Wang,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Document Use During a Research Project. Study I. Document Selection , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[6]  P. Impicciatore,et al.  Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home , 1997, BMJ.

[7]  Peiling Wang,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Document Use During a Research Project. Study II. Decisions at the Reading and Citing Stages , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Jane Klobas.  Finding out about developments in information technology: A comparison of the information seeking behaviour of librarians and computing professionals , 1991 .

[9]  Maurizio Bonati,et al.  Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Manish Latthe,et al.  Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. , 1997, JAMA.

[12]  Pam Bidwell.  In Search of Quality: The Tools and Techniques of Health Researchers on the Internet , 2000 .

[13]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Information in practice Towards quality management of medical information on the internet : evaluation , labelling , and filtering of information , 1998 .

[14]  Rory Watson.  European Commission to publish a code of practice for websites , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Soo Young Rieh.  Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Library science research: some results of its dissemination and utilization , 1985 .

[17]  Soo Young Rieh.  Judgement of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002 .

[18]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  Beyond information quality: fitness for purpose and electronic information resource use , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..

[19]  John Renner,et al.  Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[20]  J C Wyatt,et al.  Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web , 1997, BMJ.

[21]  V P Abbott,et al.  Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings. , 2000, Journal of public health medicine.

[22]  S M Dorman,et al.  Evaluating health-related Web sites. , 1997, The Journal of school health.