Impact of vapor recompression in batch distillation on energy consumption, cost and CO2 emission: Open-loop versus closed-loop operation

Abstract This paper aims at analyzing the thermal integration of direct vapor recompression system with a distillation column operated in batch mode. The unsteady state nature of the batch processing makes the use of vapor recompression a challenging task. For a meaningful comparison, it is attempted to run the vapor recompressed batch distillation (VRBD) column at same dynamics with its conventional counterpart. With this operating objective, the manipulation of a few process variables is proposed in open-loop fashion. Along with the energy savings and total annualized cost, the CO 2 emission level is also used for quantitative performance evaluation of the proposed VRBD column. Aiming to produce a constant and high-purity distillate product, a gain-scheduled proportional integral (GSPI) controller that targets to keep the stability margin constant is devised for the VRBD process. Finally, this heat integration mechanism is illustrated by a binary batch distillation example in both open-loop and closed-loop modes. It is investigated that the VRBD shows a slightly higher energy savings (62%) compared to its closed-loop version (59.13%) but at the expense of distillate purity. The heat integration also achieves a significant savings in cost and CO 2 emission.

[1]  Amiya K. Jana,et al.  Heat integrated distillation operation , 2010 .

[2]  Amiya K. Jana,et al.  An Adaptive Vapor Recompression Scheme for a Ternary Batch Distillation with a Side Withdrawal , 2012 .

[3]  R. Smith,et al.  Targeting flue gas emissions , 1991 .

[4]  Paul Langston,et al.  Economic feasibility of heat pumps in distillation to reduce energy use , 2009 .

[5]  M. Nakaiwa,et al.  Energy saving in multicomponent separation using an internally heat-integrated distillation column (HIDiC) , 2006 .

[6]  Amiya K. Jana,et al.  Reducing total annualized cost and CO2 emissions in batch distillation: Dynamics and control , 2013 .

[7]  A. Jana,et al.  Assessment of the implementation of vapor recompression technique in batch distillation , 2013 .

[8]  Amiya K. Jana,et al.  A novel heat integrated batch distillation scheme , 2011 .

[9]  Anton A. Kiss,et al.  Energy efficient control of a BTX dividing-wall column , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  M. J. Hutzler,et al.  Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States , 1995 .

[11]  Rakesh Agrawal,et al.  Energy Efficiency Limitations of the Conventional Heat Integrated Distillation Column (HIDiC) Configuration for Binary Distillation , 2011 .

[12]  James M. Douglas,et al.  Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes , 1988 .

[13]  Peter Lang,et al.  Separation of an acetone-methanol mixture by pressure-swing batch distillation in a double-column system with and without thermal integration , 2010 .

[14]  Amiya K. Jana,et al.  Improving Energy Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness of Batch Distillation for Separating Wide Boiling Constituents. 1. Vapor Recompression Column , 2012 .

[15]  Amiya K. Jana,et al.  Economic feasibility of a novel energy efficient middle vessel batch distillation to reduce energy use , 2012 .

[16]  Amiya K. Jana,et al.  Performance investigation of a variable speed vapor recompression reactive batch rectifier , 2011 .

[17]  Anoop Singh,et al.  Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources , 2011 .

[18]  Antonio Flores-Tlacuahuac,et al.  Modeling, simulation and control of an internally heat integrated pressure-swing distillation process for bioethanol separation , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..