The milled surface as a precision attachment.

The creation of paralleled, milled surfaces in natural or restored abutment teeth, coupled with removable partial denture castings that have optimal contact with these preparations, results in a path of insertion and removal that is controlled in a manner similar to one using conventional precision attachments. Because the milled surfaces are primarily extracoronal, little if any, additional tooth reduction is required for adequate mouth preparation. Avoiding additional tooth reduction minimizes later abutment fracture. The great increase in stability and resistance to rotational movements, when combined with conventional posterior clasping, provides a reasonable alternative to the precision attachment in providing maximal esthetics for the partially edentulous patients.

[1]  P Schärer,et al.  A retrospective study of combined fixed-removable reconstructions with their analysis of failures. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[2]  R. Wright,et al.  A technique to create appropriate abutment tooth contours for removable partial dentures. , 1999, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[3]  J. Rubenstein,et al.  A light-polymerized resin support tray as an aid for recording centric relation. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  B. Owall Precision attachment retained removable partial dentures: 1. Technical long-term study. , 1991, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[5]  D. E. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of prefabricated lingual rest seats for removable partial dentures. , 1982, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  J. Brudvik,et al.  The tooth-removable partial denture interface. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  T. D. Taylor,et al.  Resin-bonded components for maxillofacial prosthesis construction: a clinical trial. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  Stefano Gracis,et al.  Clinical considerations and rationale for the use of simplified instrumentation in occlusal rehabilitation. Part 1: Mounting of the models on the articulator. , 2003, The international journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[9]  C. Janus,et al.  A retrospective clinical study of resin-bonded cingulum rest seats. , 1996, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[10]  R. P. Frank,et al.  An investigation of the effectiveness of indirect retainers. , 1977, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  D G Jochen Achieving planned parallel guiding planes for removable partial dentures. , 1972, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  B. Leroux,et al.  Relationship between the standards of removable partial denture construction, clinical acceptability, and patient satisfaction. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  J E Holt Guiding planes: when and where. , 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  Frank J. Kratochvil,et al.  Influence of occlusal rest position and clasp design on movement of abutment teeth , 1963 .

[15]  G. Latta Composite resin contouring of abutment teeth for rotational path removable partial dentures. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  P. Schärer,et al.  Resin-bonded etched castings with extracoronal attachments for removable partial dentures. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  M Sherriff,et al.  Accuracy of fit of cobalt-chromium removable partial denture frameworks on master casts. , 1993, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry.

[18]  T. Taylor Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics , 2000 .

[19]  Partial denture technics , 1941 .

[20]  M. Piirto,et al.  Enamel bonding plastic materials in modifying the form of abutment teeth for the better functioning of partial prostheses. , 1977, Journal of oral rehabilitation.