The Effect of Contour Closure on Shape Recognition

Recent research on the Gestalt principle of closure has focused on how the presence of closure affects the ability to detect contours hidden in cluttered visual arrays. Some of the earliest research on closure, however, dealt with encoding and recognizing closed and open shapes, rather than detection. This research re-addresses the relation between closure and shape memory, focusing on how contour closure affects the ability to learn to recognize novel contour shapes. Of particular interest is whether closed contour shapes are easier to learn to recognize and, if so, whether this benefit is due to better encoding of closed contour shapes or easier comparison of closed contour shapes to already learned shapes. The results show that closed contours are indeed easier to recognize and, further, that this advantage appears to be related to better encoding.

[1]  D. Holmes.  Search for "closure" in a visually perceived pattern. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Pu Tse.  A planar cut approach to volume recovery from silhouettes , 1999 .

[3]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Visual comparisons within and between object parts: evidence for a single-part superiority effect , 2003, Vision Research.

[4]  Barbara Gillam.  New evidence for “closure” in perception , 1975 .

[5]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  The visual contour in depth , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Globally inconsistent figure/ground relations induced by a negative part. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[7]  J J Koenderink,et al.  What Does the Occluding Contour Tell Us about Solid Shape? , 1984, Perception.

[8]  M. Peterson.  Object Recognition Processes Can and Do Operate Before Figure–Ground Organization , 1994 .

[9]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Bayesian inference of form and shape. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[11]  J. Gibson.  The reproduction of visually perceived forms , 1929 .

[12]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Salience of visual parts , 1997, Cognition.

[13]  H. Blum.  Biological shape and visual science (part I) , 1973 .

[14]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[15]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[17]  Gestalt Concept of Closure: A Construct without Closure , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[18]  Volker H. Franz,et al.  Effects of object shape on the visual guidance of action , 2010, Vision Research.

[19]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[20]  L. Finkel,et al.  Extraction of perceptually salient contours by striate cortical networks , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Contour grouping: closure effects are explained by good continuation and proximity , 2004, Vision Research.

[22]  Friedrich-Wilhelm Wulf.  Beitrge zur Psychologie der Gestalt: VI. ber die Vernderung von Vorstellungen (Gedchtnis und Gestalt) , 1922 .

[23]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  The shape of holes , 2003, Cognition.

[24]  Manish Singh,et al.  What change detection tells us about the visual representation of shape. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[25]  J. Feldman,et al.  Information along contours and object boundaries. , 2005, Psychological review.

[26]  G. Woodman,et al.  Lower region: a new cue for figure-ground assignment. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  The role of closure in defining the “objects” of object-based attention , 2005 .

[28]  D M Levi,et al.  The effect of contour closure on shape perception. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[29]  M. Land.  Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology, Vicki Bruce, Patrick Green. Lawrence Erlbaum, London (1985), xiii, +369. Price £8.95 (paperback) , 1986 .

[30]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[32]  James Elder,et al.  The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes , 1993, Vision Research.

[33]  B. Gibson,et al.  Shape Recognition Inputs To Figure-Ground Organization in Three-Dimensional Displays , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[35]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Constraints on long range interactions mediating contour detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[36]  M. Wertheimer.  Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[37]  Alexandria C Marino,et al.  The role of closure in defining the "objects" of object-based attention. , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  M. Peterson,et al.  Inhibitory competition in figure-ground perception: context and convexity. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[39]  Rolf Nelson,et al.  Figure – Ground Effects on Shape Memory for Objects versus Holes , 2008, Perception.

[40]  Mary A Peterson,et al.  Inhibitory competition between shape properties in figure-ground perception. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.