Mapping vulnerability of multiple aquifers using multiple models and fuzzy logic to objectively derive model structures.

Driven by contamination risks, mapping Vulnerability Indices (VI) of multiple aquifers (both unconfined and confined) is investigated by integrating the basic DRASTIC framework with multiple models overarched by Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). The DRASTIC framework is a proactive tool to assess VI values using the data from the hydrosphere, lithosphere and anthroposphere. However, a research case arises for the application of multiple models on the ground of poor determination coefficients between the VI values and non-point anthropogenic contaminants. The paper formulates SCFL models, which are derived from the multiple model philosophy of Supervised Committee (SC) machines and Fuzzy Logic (FL) and hence SCFL as their integration. The Fuzzy Logic-based (FL) models include: Sugeno Fuzzy Logic (SFL), Mamdani Fuzzy Logic (MFL), Larsen Fuzzy Logic (LFL) models. The basic DRASTIC framework uses prescribed rating and weighting values based on expert judgment but the four FL-based models (SFL, MFL, LFL and SCFL) derive their values as per internal strategy within these models. The paper reports that FL and multiple models improve considerably on the correlation between the modeled vulnerability indices and observed nitrate-N values and as such it provides evidence that the SCFL multiple models can be an alternative to the basic framework even for multiple aquifers. The study area with multiple aquifers is in Varzeqan plain, East Azerbaijan, northwest Iran.

[1]  Nasser Talebbeydokhti,et al.  Optimization of DRASTIC method by artificial neural network, nitrate vulnerability index, and composite DRASTIC models to assess groundwater vulnerability for unconfined aquifer of Shiraz Plain, Iran , 2016, Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering.

[2]  Chang-Hsu Chen,et al.  A committee machine with empirical formulas for permeability prediction , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[3]  V. J. Majd,et al.  Aquifer vulnerability assessment using GIS and fuzzy system: a case study in Tehran–Karaj aquifer, Iran , 2009 .

[4]  S. Shrestha,et al.  Assessment of groundwater vulnerability and risk to pollution in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Mahdi Zarghami,et al.  Localization of Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using Catastrophe Theory , 2016, Water Resources Management.

[6]  S. Shakhari.  Water Quality Data , 2018 .

[7]  A. Hounslow.  Water Quality Data: Analysis and Interpretation , 1995 .

[8]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge , 2002 .

[9]  Marwa M. Hassan,et al.  Supervised Intelligence Committee Machine to Evaluate Field Performance of Photocatalytic Asphalt Pavement for Ambient Air Purification , 2015 .

[10]  Frank T.-C. Tsai,et al.  Supervised committee machine with artificial intelligence for prediction of fluoride concentration , 2013 .

[11]  Frank T.-C. Tsai,et al.  Prediction and structural uncertainty analyses of artificial neural networks using hierarchical Bayesian model averaging , 2015 .

[12]  Somayeh Asadi,et al.  Artificial intelligence modeling to evaluate field performance of photocatalytic asphalt pavement for ambient air purification , 2014, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[13]  M. Reza Rezaee,et al.  Petrophysical data prediction from seismic attributes using committee fuzzy inference system , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[14]  Liu Rui,et al.  Fuzzy c-Means Clustering Algorithm , 2008 .

[15]  A A Nadiri,et al.  Supervised Intelligent Committee Machine Method for Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[16]  Vahid Nourani,et al.  Forecasting Spatiotemproal Water Levels of Tabriz Aquifer , 2008 .

[17]  A. Ahmadi,et al.  Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using Fuzzy Logic: A Case Study in the Zayandehrood Aquifers, Iran , 2012, Environmental Management.

[18]  Stephen L. Chiu,et al.  Fuzzy Model Identification Based on Cluster Estimation , 1994, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[19]  E. H. Mamdani,et al.  Advances in the linguistic synthesis of fuzzy controllers , 1976 .

[20]  Barnali M. Dixon,et al.  Optimization of DRASTIC method by supervised committee machine artificial intelligence to assess groundwater vulnerability for Maragheh–Bonab plain aquifer, Iran , 2013 .

[21]  Sunanda Mitra,et al.  Adaptive fuzzy leader clustering of complex data sets in pattern recognition , 1992, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[22]  Barnali M. Dixon,et al.  Applicability of neuro-fuzzy techniques in predicting ground-water vulnerability: a GIS-based sensitivity analysis , 2005 .

[23]  Karim Salahshoor,et al.  Estimation of NMR log parameters from conventional well log data using a committee machine with intelligent systems: A case study from the Iranian part of the South Pars gas field, Persian Gulf Basin , 2010 .

[24]  G. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy logic in geology , 2004 .

[25]  J. A. Grande,et al.  Fuzzy Modeling of the Spatial Evolution of the Chemistry in the Tinto River (SW Spain) , 2010 .

[26]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Mapping the groundwater vulnerability for pollution at the pan African scale. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Erhan Şener,et al.  Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey) , 2012, Hydrogeology Journal.

[28]  P. Martin Larsen,et al.  Industrial applications of fuzzy logic control , 1980 .

[29]  Rahman Khatibi,et al.  Groundwater vulnerability indices conditioned by Supervised Intelligence Committee Machine (SICM). , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  Kwang Hyung Lee,et al.  First Course on Fuzzy Theory and Applications , 2005, Advances in Soft Computing.

[31]  Nima Chitsazan,et al.  Bayesian Artificial Intelligence Model Averaging for Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation , 2014 .

[32]  Erhan Şener,et al.  Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[33]  Mu-Song Chen,et al.  Fuzzy clustering analysis for optimizing fuzzy membership functions , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[34]  Rahman Khatibi,et al.  Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using supervised committee to combine fuzzy logic models , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[35]  Yanguo Teng,et al.  Assessment and validation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in Jilin City of northeast China. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  J. Bezdek,et al.  FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm , 1984 .

[37]  Quantitative evaluation of specific vulnerability to nitrate for groundwater resource protection based on process-based simulation model. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[38]  Tetsuya Hiyama,et al.  A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[39]  Mohammad Reza Nikoo,et al.  Groundwater risk assessment based on optimization framework using DRASTIC method , 2016, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.