Motion of threaded cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Abstract A high rate of pseudarthrosis and a high overall rate of implant migration requiring surgical revision has been reported following posterior lumbar interbody fusion using BAK threaded cages. The high rate of both pseudarthrosis and implant migration may be due to poor fixation of the implant. The purpose of this study was to analyse the motion of threaded cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Six cadaveric human lumbar spine segments (three L2/3 and three L4/5 segments) were prepared for biomechanical testing. The segments were tested, without preload, under forces of axial compression (600 N), torsion (25 Nm) and shearing force (250 N). The tests were performed first with the segments in an intact state, and subsequently following instrumented stabilisation with two BAK cages via a posterior approach. These results were compared with those of a finite element model simulating the effects of identical forces on the segments with constructs. As the results were comparable, the finite element model was used for analysing the motion of BAK cages within the disc space. Motion of the implants was not seen in compression. In torsion, a rolling motion was noted, with a range of motion of 10.6° around the central axis of the implant when left/right torsion (25 Nm) was applied. The way the implants move within the segment may be due to their special shape: the thread of the implants can not prevent the BAK cages rolling within the disc space.

[1]  L. Claes,et al.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[2]  V. Goel,et al.  Prediction of Load Sharing Among Spinal Components of a C5‐C6 Motion Segment Using the Finite Element Approach , 1998, Spine.

[3]  T. Whitesides.  Traumatic Kyphosis of the Thoracolumbar Spine , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  W C Hayes,et al.  Load Sharing Between the Shell and Centrum in the Lumbar Vertebral Body , 1997, Spine.

[5]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Interlaminar Shear Stresses and Laminae Separation in a Disc: Finite Element Analysis of the L3‐L4 Motion Segment Subjected to Axial Compressive Loads , 1995, Spine.

[6]  R. B. Cloward.  The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care. , 1953, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  W. Hayes,et al.  Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate. , 1994, Bone.

[8]  M. Adams,et al.  Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  M. Adams,et al.  Mechanical testing of the spine. An appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. , 1995, Spine.

[10]  B. Myers,et al.  Strength and Stability of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Titanium Fiber Mesh Implant and Tricortical Bone Graft , 1997, Spine.

[11]  P M Lin,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique: complications and pitfalls. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  V K Goel,et al.  Applications of the finite element method to thoracolumbar spinal research--past, present, and future. , 1995, Spine.

[13]  D N Kunz,et al.  Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Biomechanical Comparison, Including a New Threaded Cage , 1997, Spine.

[14]  J. Brantigan,et al.  A Carbon Fiber Implant to Aid Interbody Lumbar Fusion: Mechanical Testing , 1991, Spine.

[15]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  A finite element study of a lumbar motion segment subjected to pure sagittal plane moments. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  H. Larocca,et al.  The Failed Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 1991, Spine.

[17]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  The Bagby and Kuslich Method of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: History, Techniques, and 2‐Year Follow‐up Results of a United States Prospective, Multicenter Trial , 1998, Spine.

[18]  H. Briggs,et al.  CHIP FUSION OF THE LOW BACK FOLLOWING EXPLORATION OF THE SPINAL CANAL , 1944 .