Electrical study of DSA shrink process and CD rectification effect at sub-60nm using EUV test vehicle

In this study, the integrity and the benefits of the DSA shrink process were verified through a via-chain test structure, which was fabricated by either DSA or baseline litho/etch process for via layer formation while metal layer processes remain the same. The nearest distance between the vias in this test structure is below 60nm, therefore, the following process components were included: 1) lamella-forming BCP for forming self-aligned via (SAV), 2) EUV printed guiding pattern, and 3) PS-philic sidewall. The local CDU (LCDU) of minor axis was improved by 30% after DSA shrink process. We compared two DSA Via shrink processes and a DSA_Control process, in which guiding patterns (GP) were directly transferred to the bottom OPL without DSA shrink. The DSA_Control apparently resulted in larger CD, thus, showed much higher open current and shorted the dense via chains. The non-optimized DSA shrink process showed much broader current distribution than the improved DSA shrink process, which we attributed to distortion and dislocation of the vias and ineffective SAV. Furthermore, preliminary defectivity study of our latest DSA process showed that the primary defect mode is likely to be etch-related. The challenges, strategies applied to improve local CD uniformity and electrical current distribution, and potential adjustments were also discussed.

[2]  Hirokazu Kato,et al.  Electrical Via Chain Yield for DSA Contact Hole Shrink Process , 2013 .

[3]  Seiji Nagahara,et al.  High-volume manufacturing equipment and processing for directed self-assembly applications , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Makoto Muramatsu,et al.  Nanopatterning of diblock copolymer directed self-assembly lithography with wet development , 2012 .

[5]  Nelson Felix,et al.  Comparison of left and right side line edge roughness in lithography , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Geert Vandenberghe,et al.  Implementation of templated DSA for via layer patterning at the 7nm node , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Lei Sun,et al.  Line edge roughness frequency analysis for SAQP process , 2016, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Ryoung-Han Kim,et al.  Directed self-assembly aware restricted design rule and its impact on design ability , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Roel Gronheid,et al.  Integration of a templated directed self-assembly-based hole shrink in a short loop via chain , 2016 .

[10]  Stephen Hsu,et al.  Application of EUV resolution enhancement techniques (RET) to optimize and extend single exposure bi-directional patterning for 7nm and beyond logic designs , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Kathryn W. Guarini,et al.  Optimization of diblock copolymer thin film self assembly , 2002 .

[12]  K. Guarini,et al.  Polymer self assembly in semiconductor microelectronics , 2006 .

[13]  Neal Lafferty,et al.  Progress towards the integration of optical proximity correction and directed self-assembly of block copolymers with graphoepitaxy , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Shoji Mimotogi,et al.  DFM for defect-free DSA hole shrink process , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[15]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[16]  Yi Cao,et al.  Process optimization of templated DSA flows , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[17]  Nelson Felix,et al.  DSA via hole shrink for advanced node applications , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.