Evaluation of Six Presumptive Tests for Blood, Their Specificity, Sensitivity, and Effect on High Molecular‐Weight DNA

ABSTRACT: Luminol, leuchomalachite green, phenolphthalein, Hemastix®, Hemident™, and Bluestar© are all used as presumptive tests for blood. In this study, the tests were subjected to dilute blood (from 1:10,000 to 1:10,000,000), many common household substance, and chemicals. Samples were tested for DNA to determine whether the presumptive tests damaged or destroyed DNA. The DNA loci tested were D2S1338 and D19S433. Leuchomalachite green had a sensitivity of 1:10,000, while the remaining tests were able to detect blood to a dilution of 1:100,000. Substances tested include saliva, semen, potato, tomato, tomato sauce, tomato sauce with meat, red onion, red kidney bean, horseradish, 0.1 M ascorbic acid, 5% bleach, 10% cupric sulfate, 10% ferric sulfate, and 10% nickel chloride. Of all the substances tested, not one of the household items reacted with every test; however, the chemicals did. DNA was recovered and amplified from luminol, phenolphthalein, Hemastix®, and Bluestar©, but not from leuchomalachite green or Hemident™.

[1]  L. Lytle,et al.  Chemiluminescence in the visualization of forensic bloodstains. , 1978, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  Harpreet Singh,et al.  Detection and Origin of Blood Stains on Various Types of Cloth Immersed in Water for a Prolonged Period , 1984 .

[3]  Richard Saferstein,et al.  Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic science , 1977 .

[4]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[5]  The effects of the argon lon laser on subsequent blood examinations. , 1982, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  G. Miskelly,et al.  Inhibition of bleach-induced luminol chemiluminescence. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  P. L. Kirk,et al.  Simplified Preliminary Blood Testing--An Improved Technique and a Comparative Study of Methods , 1951 .

[8]  M. Cox,et al.  A study of the sensitivity and specificity of four presumptive tests for blood. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  B Budowle,et al.  The presumptive reagent fluorescein for detection of dilute bloodstains and subsequent STR typing of recovered DNA. , 2000, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  A. C. Ponce,et al.  Critical Revision of Presumptive Tests for Bloodstains , 1999 .

[11]  A. C. Hunt,et al.  The identification of human blood stains: a critical survey , 1960 .

[12]  M N Hochmeister,et al.  Effects of presumptive test reagents on the ability to obtain restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns from human blood and semen stains. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  A. Gross,et al.  The effect of luminol on presumptive tests and DNA analysis using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[14]  R. E. Gaennsslen,et al.  Sourcebook in Forensic Serology, Immunology, and Biochemistry , 1983 .

[15]  Effect of fabric washing on the presumptive identification of bloodstains. , 1990, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  R. S. Higaki,et al.  A STUDY OF THE SENSITIVITY, STABILITY AND SPECIFICITY OF PHENOLPHTHALEIN AS AN INDICATOR TEST FOR BLOOD , 1976 .

[17]  D. L. Laux.  Effects of luminol on the subsequent analysis of bloodstains. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[18]  K. Gleu,et al.  Über 3‐Aminophthalsäure‐hydrazid , 1936 .

[19]  L J Kricka,et al.  Phenols as enhancers of the chemiluminescent horseradish peroxidase-luminol-hydrogen peroxide reaction: application in luminescence-monitored enzyme immunoassays. , 1985, Clinical chemistry.

[20]  C. Frégeau,et al.  Fingerprint enhancement revisited and the effects of blood enhancement chemicals on subsequent profiler Plus fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis of fresh and aged bloody fingerprints. , 2000, Journal of forensic sciences.