The Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) App: a novel teaching tool for minimally invasive esophagectomy

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is an alternative to open surgery for patients requiring esophageal resection. Despite the potential of MIE to reduce patient morbidity, the complexity of the procedure has made it challenging to learn, therefore limiting widespread adoption. An interactive computer- and smartphone-based application has been developed to facilitate comprehensive teaching of MIE. Methods: The entire Ivor-Lewis MIE procedure was broken down into fundamental steps. A text-based atlas was created to guide the learner through all phases of the operation. Surgical videos of the associated steps were also captured and annotated. Finally, a 3-dimensional (3D) modeling platform was used to create a simulated environment in which learners can test their knowledge of the procedure. Results: Our application delivers an easy-to-use, multi-platform learning tool. It combines didactic text-based learning with high-definition videos and a realistic, interactive simulator. Conclusions: The MIE App allows individuals to learn and simulate each fundamental step of Ivor-Lewis MIE. It provides accompanying videos as well as a detailed text-based atlas. The application is available through multiple platforms (PC/Mac, Android, and iOS) and provides objective evaluation via an interactive competency assessment tool. We hope that this application will serve as an adjunct to traditional operating room exposure, allowing for accelerated adoption of MIE.

[1]  B. Lengelé,et al.  En bloc and standard esophagectomies by thoracoscopy. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  Surgical simulation in 2013: why is it still not the standard in surgical training? , 2014, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  Edward D. Percy,et al.  Video demonstration of the MIE App showing all features of this multi-platform application for teaching MIE , 2018 .

[4]  C. Gupte,et al.  Training effect of using Touch Surgery for intramedullary femoral nailing. , 2016, Injury.

[5]  L. Swanstrom,et al.  Laparoscopic total esophagectomy. , 1997, Archives of surgery.

[6]  Ghulam Abbas,et al.  Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Review of Over 1000 Patients , 2012, Annals of surgery.

[7]  A. Esterman,et al.  Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  R. van Hillegersberg,et al.  Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. , 2009, Minerva chirurgica.

[9]  C. Mariette,et al.  Hybrid minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: A multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III controlled trial, the MIRO trial. , 2015 .

[10]  Ming Yan,et al.  Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer. , 2014, Journal of thoracic disease.

[11]  J. Byrne,et al.  A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. , 2013, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

[12]  E. Grecco,et al.  Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. , 1995, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[13]  J. Tulipan,et al.  Touch Surgery: Analysis and Assessment of Validity of a Hand Surgery Simulation “App” , 2019, Hand.