An optimized registration workflow and standard geometric space for small animal brain imaging

The reliability of scientific results critically depends on reproducible and transparent data processing. Cross-subject and cross-study comparability of imaging data in general, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data in particular, is contingent on the quality of registration to a standard reference space. In small animal MRI this is not adequately provided by currently used processing workflows, which utilize high-level scripts optimized for human data, and adapt animal data to fit the scripts, rather than vice-versa. In this fully reproducible article we showcase a generic work-flow optimized for the mouse brain, alongside a standard reference space suited to harmonize data between analysis and operation. We present four separate metrics for automated quality control (QC), and a visualization method to aid operator inspection. Benchmarking this workflow against common legacy practices reveals that it performs more consistently, better preserves variance across subjects while minimizing variance across sessions, and improves both volume and smoothness conservation RMSE approximately 2-fold. We propose this open source workflow and the QC metrics as a new standard for small animal MRI registration, ensuring work-flow robustness, data comparability, and region assignment validity, all of which are indispensable prerequisites for the comparability of scientific results across experiments and centers.

[1]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  K. Jarrod Millman,et al.  Python for Scientists and Engineers , 2011, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[3]  Mehmet Fatih Yanik,et al.  An Automated Open-Source Workflow for Standards-Compliant Integration of Small Animal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2019, bioRxiv.

[4]  Jeremy F. P. Ullmann,et al.  Robust methods to create ex vivo minimum deformation atlases for brain mapping. , 2015, Methods.

[5]  Wes McKinney,et al.  Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python , 2010, SciPy.

[6]  Horea-Ioan Ioanas,et al.  Gentoo Linux for Neuroscience - a replicable, flexible, scalable, rolling-release environment that provides direct access to development software , 2017 .

[7]  Travis E. Oliphant,et al.  Guide to NumPy , 2015 .

[8]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[9]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  FMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI , 2018, bioRxiv.

[10]  Valerio Zerbi,et al.  Dysfunctional Autism Risk Genes Cause Circuit-Specific Connectivity Deficits With Distinct Developmental Trajectories , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Paul A. Taylor,et al.  FMRI Clustering in AFNI: False-Positive Rates Redux , 2017, Brain Connect..

[12]  Milan Sonka,et al.  RATS: Rapid Automatic Tissue Segmentation in rodent brain MRI , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain , 2007, Nature.

[14]  J. S. Long,et al.  Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model , 2000 .

[15]  Mary E. Meyerand,et al.  The influence of spatial resolution and smoothing on the detectability of resting-state and task fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[16]  F. Helmchen,et al.  A brain-wide functional map of the serotonergic responses to acute stress and fluoxetine , 2019, Nature Communications.

[17]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Inter-Subject Correlation of Brain Hemodynamic Responses During Watching a Movie: Localization in Space and Frequency , 2009, Front. Neuroinform..

[18]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments , 2016, Scientific Data.

[19]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies , 2019 .

[20]  Arno Klein,et al.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  R. Mark Henkelman,et al.  High resolution three-dimensional brain atlas using an average magnetic resonance image of 40 adult C57Bl/6J mice , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  Tobias C. Wood,et al.  rBET: Making BET work for Rodent Brains , 2013 .

[23]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Katherine J Lobur,et al.  A genetic approach to access serotonin neurons for in vivo and in vitro studies. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[26]  D. W. Scott On optimal and data based histograms , 1979 .

[27]  B. Rosen,et al.  Investigation of the early response to rat forepaw stimulation , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Skipper Seabold,et al.  Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python , 2010, SciPy.

[29]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[30]  Markus Rudin,et al.  COSplay: Contrast Optimized Stimulation Player , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..