Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data.

In the response signal paradigm, a test stimulus is presented, and then at one of a number of experimenter-determined times, a signal to respond is presented. Response signal, standard response time (RT), and accuracy data were collected from 19 college-age and 19 60- to 75-year-old participants in a numerosity discrimination task. The data were fit with 2 versions of the diffusion model. Response signal data were modeled by assuming a mixture of processes, those that have terminated before the signal and those that have not terminated; in the latter case, decisions are based on either partial information or guessing. The effects of aging on performance in the regular RT task were explained the same way in the models, with a 70- to 100-ms increase in the nondecision component of processing, more conservative decision criteria, and more variability across trials in drift and the nondecision component of processing, but little difference in drift rate (evidence). In the response signal task, the primary reason for a slower rise in the response signal functions for older participants was variability in the nondecision component of processing. Overall, the results were consistent with earlier fits of the diffusion model to the standard RT task for college-age participants and to the data from aging studies using this task in the standard RT procedure.

[1]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[2]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A model of the go/no-go task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Application of the diffusion model to two-choice tasks for adults 75-90 years old. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[4]  R. Ratcliff Modeling response signal and response time data , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Aging and individual differences in rapid two-choice decisions , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Andreas Voss,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of adult age differences in episodic and semantic long-term memory retrieval. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Aging and response times: a comparison of sequential sampling models , 2005 .

[8]  M. Shadlen,et al.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[9]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Order Relations in Perceptual Matching , 2005 .

[10]  A. Voss,et al.  Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[11]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[12]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays , 2004, Vision Research.

[13]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Analysis of the Effects of Aging on Recognition Memory Journal of Memory and Language , 2003 .

[14]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[15]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on letter discrimination. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[16]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Adele Diederich,et al.  Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time , 2003 .

[18]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[21]  J. Townsend,et al.  Multialternative Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic Connectionist Model of Decision Making , 2001 .

[22]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  J. J. Ryan,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III , 2001 .

[24]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[25]  G. Laver A speed-accuracy analysis of word recognition in young and older adults. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[26]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Dynamic Models of Response Time and Accuracy: A Foundational Primer. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[27]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[30]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[31]  Philip L. Smith Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. , 1995 .

[32]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Time-Accuracy Functions for Determining Process and Person Differences: An Application To Cognitive Aging , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Effects of decision criterion on response latencies of binary decisions , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial Retrieval Processes in the Recovery of Order Information , 1993 .

[35]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[36]  R. D. de Jong Partial information or facilitation? Different interpretations of results from speed-accuracy decomposition. , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  A. Kaufman,et al.  Assessing Adolescent and Adult Intelligence , 1990 .

[38]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[41]  B. Dosher Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  B. Dosher Effect of Sentence Size and Network Distance on Retrieval Speed. , 1982 .

[43]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Speed and Accuracy in the Processing of False Statements About Semantic Information , 1982 .

[44]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The effects of delay and interference: A speed-accuracy study , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A note on modeling accumulation of information when the rate of accumulation changes over time , 1980 .

[46]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[47]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time — a reply , 1979 .

[48]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[49]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Semantic Memory Retrieval: Analysis by Speed Accuracy Tradeoff Functions* , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  John C. Schmitt,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time , 1977 .

[51]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Associative Interference and Retrieval Dynamics in Yes-No Recall and Recognition. , 1977 .

[52]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[53]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[54]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  A. V. Reed,et al.  List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[56]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Human information processing : tutorials in performance and cognition , 1975 .

[57]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[58]  S. Link,et al.  A sequential theory of psychological discrimination , 1975 .

[59]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[60]  Richard G. Swensson,et al.  The elusive tradeoff: Speed vs accuracy in visual discrimination tasks , 1972 .

[61]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[62]  J. F. Schouten,et al.  Reaction time and accuracy. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[63]  W. Lee,et al.  CATEGORIZING EXTERNALLY DISTRIBUTED STIMULUS SAMPLES FOR THREE CONTINUA. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[64]  M. Stone Models for choice-reaction time , 1960 .