Sensor technologies and capabilities have an effect on observational data quality. Typically, data management begins, at best, when a data manager obtains the data and needs to describe it sufficiently to data consumers. Often, the sensing methods are not adequately described and the data manager does not know the appropriate questions to ask or where to direct questions about sensors, their configuration, and the deployment. Consequently, knowledge often remains buried in sensor manuals and field operator logs. Thus, most metadata requirements have been simplified to accommodate this gap in knowledge.When information is captured where it is best understood and tools are created to easily capture this knowledge, machine-actionable descriptions can be provided to adequately describe the processes taken in generating observations. The information can be associated with the data and thus be accessible, discoverable and used in data quality control by data providers and in data quality assessment by the data consumers.Here, we define actors and actions to promote role-based creation of fully-described, standards-based documents. These documents can be created in SensorML (OGC SWE) that includes links to resolvable term definitions (W3C Semantic Web), enabling the creation of associated mappings and ontologies to extend and resolve the meaning of each term.
[1]
John Davidson,et al.
Ogc® sensor web enablement:overview and high level achhitecture.
,
2007,
2007 IEEE Autotestcon.
[2]
Simon Jirka.
Marine Profiles for OGC Sensor Web Enablement Standards
,
2016
.
[3]
George Percivall,et al.
Ogc® sensor web enablement:overview and high level achhitecture.
,
2007
.
[4]
Janet J. Fredericks.
Persistence of Knowledge across Layered Architectures
,
2015
.
[5]
Carlos Rueda,et al.
The MMI Ontology Registry and Repository: A portal for Marine Metadata Interoperability
,
2009,
OCEANS 2009.
[6]
Christoph Waldmann,et al.
Intergrating quality assurance and quality control into open geopatial consortium sensor web enablement
,
2010
.