The value of a datum – how little data do we need for a quantitative risk analysis?

Aim Conservation managers are typically faced with limited resources, time and information. The philosophy underlying risk assessment should be robust to these limitations. While there is a broad support for the concept of risk assessments, there is a tendency to rely on expert opinion and exclude formal data analysis, possibly because available information is often scarce. When data analyses are conducted, often much simplified models are advocated, even though this means excluding processes believed by experts to be important. In this manuscript, we ask: should statistical analyses be conducted and decisions modified based on a single datum? How many data points are needed before predictions are meaningful? Given limited data, how complex should models be? Location World-wide. Methods We use simulation approaches with known ‘true’ values to assess which inferences are possible, given different amounts of information. We use two metrics of performance: the magnitude of uncertainty (using posterior mean squared error) and bias (using P–P plots). We assess six models of relevance to conservation ecologists. Results We show that the greatest reduction in uncertainty occurred at the smallest sample sizes for models examined, and much of parameter space could be excluded. Thus, analyses based on even a single datum potentially can be useful. Further, with only a few observations, the predicted distribution of outcomes matched the probabilities of actual occurrences, even for relatively complex state-space models with multiple sources of stochasticity. Main conclusions We highlight the utility of quantitative analyses even with severely limited data, given existing practices and arguments in the conservation literature. The purpose of our manuscript is in part a philosophical discourse, as modifications are needed to how conservation ecologists are often trained to think about problems and data, and in part a demonstration via simulation analysis.

[1]  M. Burgman,et al.  Capturing social impacts for decision‐making: a Multicriteria Decision Analysis perspective , 2013 .

[2]  David A. Hennessy,et al.  Uncertainty, Risk Aversion, and Risk Management for Agricultural Producers , 2001 .

[3]  James O. Berger,et al.  An overview of robust Bayesian analysis , 1994 .

[4]  K. Mengersen,et al.  Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[5]  T Coulson,et al.  The use and abuse of population viability analysis. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  L. Joseph,et al.  Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction , 1989 .

[7]  Brian Dennis,et al.  Bayesian methods for hierarchical models: are ecologists making a Faustian bargain? , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  Geoffrey R Hosack,et al.  Assessing model structure uncertainty through an analysis of system feedback and Bayesian networks. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  Stefan Van Dongen,et al.  Prior specification in Bayesian statistics: three cautionary tales. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Michael Goldstein,et al.  Subjective Bayesian Analysis: Principles and Practice , 2006 .

[11]  M. Burgman Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management: Experts, stakeholders and elicitation , 2005 .

[12]  Frank H. Koch,et al.  Mapping ecological risks with a portfolio‐based technique: incorporating uncertainty and decision‐making preferences , 2013 .

[13]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[14]  Stefan Van Dongen,et al.  Prior specification in Bayesian statistics: three cautionary tales. , 2006 .

[15]  B. Rannala Identi(cid:142)ability of Parameters in MCMC Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny , 2002 .

[16]  D. Lodge,et al.  Take a risk: Preferring prevention over control of biological invaders , 2007 .

[17]  David R. Jones,et al.  How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The process-performance paradox in expert judgment - How can experts know so much and predict so badly? , 1991 .

[19]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  Stochastic models of population extinction. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Brian Dennis,et al.  Allee effects in stochastic populations , 2002 .

[21]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Efficacy of ‘saltwater flushing’ in protecting the Great Lakes from biological invasions by invertebrate eggs in ships’ ballast sediment , 2010 .

[22]  M. Boyce,et al.  Evaluating resource selection functions , 2002 .

[23]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Research on Judgment and Decision Making: Currents, Connections, and Controversies , 1997 .

[24]  W. G. Sprules,et al.  Ballast Wafer Exchange as a Means of Controlling Dispersal of Freshwater Organisms by Ships , 1993 .

[25]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors , 1999 .

[26]  Daniel Sol,et al.  TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[27]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  POSTERIOR PREDICTIVE ASSESSMENT OF MODEL FITNESS VIA REALIZED DISCREPANCIES , 1996 .

[28]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology , 2000, Nature.

[29]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .

[30]  M. Andersen,et al.  Potential Applications of Population Viability Analysis to Risk Assessment for Invasive Species , 2005 .

[31]  G. Glass,et al.  Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and Covariance , 1972 .

[32]  A. Gelman Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper) , 2004 .

[33]  R. Freckleton,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1999 .

[34]  James S. Clark,et al.  HIERARCHICAL BAYES FOR STRUCTURED, VARIABLE POPULATIONS: FROM RECAPTURE DATA TO LIFE‐HISTORY PREDICTION , 2005 .

[35]  Richard A. Hinrichsen,et al.  Population viability analysis for several populations using multivariate state-space models , 2009 .

[36]  D. Lodge,et al.  Fecundity as a Basis for Risk Assessment of Nonindigenous Freshwater Molluscs , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[37]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  P. Gustafson,et al.  Conservative prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models , 2006 .

[39]  Jo Anne Shatkin,et al.  Informing Environmental Decision Making by Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Analysis , 2008 .

[40]  Iven Van Mechelen,et al.  A Bayesian approach to the selection and testing of mixture models , 2003 .

[41]  James E. Bartlett,et al.  Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research , 2001 .