Evolution of Cooperation for Multiple Mutant Configurations on All Regular Graphs with N≤14 players

We study the emergence of cooperation in structured populations with any arrangement of cooperators and defectors on the evolutionary graph. Using structure coefficients defined for configurations describing such arrangements of any number of mutants, we provide results for weak selection to favor cooperation over defection on any regular graph with $N \leq 14$ vertices. Furthermore, the properties of graphs that particularly promote cooperation are analyzed. It is shown that the number of graph cycles of certain length is a good predictor for the values of the structure coefficient, and thus a tendency to favor cooperation. Another property of particularly cooperation-promoting regular graphs with a low degree is that they are structured to have blocks with clusters of mutants that are connected by cut vertices and/or hinge vertices.

[1]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on graphs , 2005, Nature.

[2]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Fixation Probabilities for Any Configuration of Two Strategies on Regular Graphs , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Yu-Ting Chen,et al.  Sharp benefit-to-cost rules for the evolution of cooperation on regular graphs , 2011, 1107.1513.

[4]  Alex McAvoy,et al.  Structural symmetry in evolutionary games , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  Krishnendu Chatterjee,et al.  Computational complexity of ecological and evolutionary spatial dynamics , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.

[7]  Swami Iyer,et al.  Evolution of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas on Complex Networks , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Hendrik Richter Fixation properties of multiple cooperator configurations on regular graphs , 2019, Theory in Biosciences.

[9]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Fitness-based models and pairwise comparison models of evolutionary games are typically different—even in unstructured populations , 2015 .

[10]  M. Nowak Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life , 2006 .

[11]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  The replicator equation on graphs. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Karan Pattni,et al.  Evolutionary graph theory revisited: when is an evolutionary process equivalent to the Moran process? , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Chiun-Chieh Hsu,et al.  Finding the Set of All Hinge Vertices for Strongly Chordal Graphs in Linear Time , 1997, Inf. Sci..

[14]  Hendrik Richter Relationships between dilemma strength and fixation properties in coevolutionary games , 2019, ICNC-FSKD.

[15]  Long Wang,et al.  Universality of weak selection. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Nils M. Kriege,et al.  A General Purpose Algorithm for Counting Simple Cycles and Simple Paths of Any Length , 2016, Algorithmica.

[17]  Yunming Xiao,et al.  Close spatial arrangement of mutants favors and disfavors fixation , 2018, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Spatial invasion of cooperation. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  M. Nowak,et al.  Supplementary Note 1: Population structure determines the tradeoff between fixation probability and fixation time , 2019 .

[20]  Hendrik Richter,et al.  Properties of network structures, structure coefficients, and benefit-to-cost ratios , 2019, Biosyst..

[21]  Chaitanya S. Gokhale,et al.  Dynamic Properties of Evolutionary Multi-player Games in Finite Populations , 2013, Games.

[22]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary graph theory: breaking the symmetry between interaction and replacement. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure , 2016, Nature.

[24]  C. Hauert Fundamental clusters in spatial 2×2 games , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Games on Graphs , 2006 .

[26]  L. Lehmann,et al.  The robustness of the weak selection approximation for the evolution of altruism against strong selection , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[27]  Markus Meringer,et al.  Fast generation of regular graphs and construction of cages , 1999, J. Graph Theory.

[28]  M. Nowak,et al.  The spatial ultimatum game , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Yue-Li Wang,et al.  A Linear Time Algorithm for Finding all Hinge Vertices of a Permutation Graph , 1996, Inf. Process. Lett..

[30]  S. Kokubo,et al.  Universal scaling for the dilemma strength in evolutionary games. , 2015, Physics of life reviews.

[31]  Burton Voorhees,et al.  Birth–death fixation probabilities for structured populations , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  Hendrik Richter,et al.  Dynamic landscape models of coevolutionary games , 2016, Biosyst..

[33]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Exploring and mapping the universe of evolutionary graphs identifies structural properties affecting fixation probability and time , 2018, Communications Biology.

[34]  Long Wang,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on graphs: Efficient method for weak selection. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  M. Broom,et al.  Game-Theoretical Models in Biology , 2013 .

[36]  Krishnendu Chatterjee,et al.  Construction of arbitrarily strong amplifiers of natural selection using evolutionary graph theory , 2018, Communications Biology.

[37]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Exact numerical calculation of fixation probability and time on graphs , 2015, Biosyst..

[38]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[39]  Jonathan Newton,et al.  Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance , 2018, Games.

[40]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  Strategy selection in structured populations. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.