Native vegetation of the South East Forests region, Eden, New South Wales

Keith, David A. and Bedward, Michael, (NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1967, Hurstville NSW Australia 2220) 1999. Native vegetation of the South East Forests region, Eden New South Wales. Cunninghamia 6(1): 001‐218. Terrestrial, freshwater and estuarine native vegetation of the Eden region was classified into 79 floristic assemblages and mapped at 1: 100 000 scale. Assemblages were derived from multivariate analysis of 1604 quantitative vegetation samples. Mapping was carried out using a hybrid decision tree-expert system approach based on quantitative relationships between floristic assemblages and spatial variables (land cover pattern, substrate, climatic variables and terrain variables) and qualitative expert knowledge derived from field experience. The use of vegetationenvironment relationships and sampling of remnants allowed prediction of vegetation patterns prior to European clearing. The map was validated using three procedures: qualitative checking by experts; reliability mapping using sampling intensity; and accuracy quantification using independent sample data. The map units were described using comprehensive profiles of diagnostic species, structural features, habitat characteristics and sample distributions. The 79 floristic assemblages include rainforests, mesic eucalypt forests, dry grassy eucalypt forests of the coastal rainshadow valleys, hinterland and tableland, dry shrubby eucalypt forests, grasslands, heathlands, scrubs and wetlands. Variation in climate and geological substrate influence vegetation patterns at regional scales, while variation in topography, local soil moisture and nutrient status and disturbance regimes influence vegetation patterns at local scales. Sixty-eight per cent of the region retained a cover of native vegetation in 1994. Processes threatening various portions of the remainder include further habitat loss from clearing, high-frequency disturbances and certain other disturbance regimes, overgrazing, habitat degradation due to nutrification, dumping and vandalism, and feral animal activity. Past depletion of habitat has been highly biased. Some grassy assemblages on fertile flat terrain are depleted by more than 90%, while some forests with shrubby understories in steep infertile terrain retain close to their original extent. The former assemblages are distributed principally as remnants on privately owned land, while the latter occur in remote areas of public land. Representation in conservation reserves is also biased against grassy assemblages in fertile flat terrain, as well as some other assemblages with restricted distributions. Opportunities for conservation of these assemblages are now very limited and rely on integrated planning, reservation and cooperative management with emphasis on private land. 1