Symmetry based 3D GPR feature enhancement and extraction

The efficient analysis of high-resolution 3D GPR data sets is of increasing importance given todays possibilities to acquire large and dense data volumes. In order to reduce data complexity and enhance the features of interest, attribute based analysis, a well-established field in reflection seismology, has received growing interest also in the GPR community. Here, we present a novel GPR attribute called phase symmetry, which is adapted from image processing. We believe that this attribute is well-suited for analyzing 3D GPR data sets. In this study, we introduce the basic concepts of phase symmetry. Using two synthetic examples and comparing phase symmetry to the well- known Canny edge detector, we illustrate that phase symmetry also provides high quality results in the presence of significant noise and smoothly varying anomalies. Using two 3D GPR field examples collected to detect buried utilities and archaeologically relevant features, respectively, demonstrates the applicability of phase symmetry to real GPR data and illustrates that this attribute is an effective tool in order to extract symmetric features embedded within a heterogeneous background. Additionally, we show that phase symmetry can be combined with the similarity attribute to jointly emphasize event symmetry and waveform similarity.

[1]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Image Features from Phase Congruency , 1995 .

[3]  Kurt J. Marfurt,et al.  3-D dip filtering and coherence applied to GPR data; a study , 1997 .

[4]  Kristofer M. Tingdahl,et al.  Meta-attributes—the key to multivolume, multiattribute interpretation , 2002 .

[5]  U. Böniger,et al.  Improving the interpretability of 3D GPR data using target–specific attributes: application to tomb detection , 2010 .

[6]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  The importance of phase in image processing filters , 1975 .

[8]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Symmetry and Asymmetry from Local Phase , 1997 .

[9]  C. Tyler Human Symmetry Perception and Its Computational Analysis , 2002 .

[10]  Robyn A. Owens,et al.  Feature detection from local energy , 1987, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[11]  John C. Davis,et al.  Contouring: A Guide to the Analysis and Display of Spatial Data , 1992 .

[12]  Robert Langridge,et al.  Visualization of active faults using geometric attributes of 3D GPR data: An example from the Alpine Fault Zone, New Zealand , 2008 .

[13]  Kurt J. Marfurt,et al.  Seismic Attributes for Prospect Identification and Reservoir Characterization , 2007 .

[14]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Detection of visual symmetries. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[15]  Brian Russell,et al.  Applying the Phase Congruency Algorithm to Seismic Data Slices - A Carbonate Case Study , 2009 .