The Practices of Unpaid Third-Party Developers - Implications for API Design

To draw on the innovation capabilities of third-party developers many organizations are currently deploying open application programming interfaces (API’s). While third-party services may offer commercial opportunities for independent software firms, a large portion of existing third-party software are undertaken without any financial compensation. Although unpaid developers offers a potential source for innovation of end-user services, the current literature has largely overlooked how these unpaid actors use and appropriate the technology provided by organizations. To this end, this research pays specific attention to the specific practices of unpaid developers. The data used for analysis were collected through a programming contest – a hackathon – where unpaid developers gather to craft end-user services. Through an ethnographic lens we present a number of recurrent activities and patterns of action employed by developers and from this analysis we present implications for API designers seeking to attract unpaid developers.

[1]  Helen Sharp,et al.  Models of motivation in software engineering , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[2]  Alexander Osterwalder,et al.  The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach , 2004 .

[3]  Vicki L. Almstrum,et al.  What is the attraction to computing? , 2003, CACM.

[4]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[5]  George Kuk,et al.  The Roles of Agency and Artifacts in Assembling Open Data Complementarities , 2011, ICIS.

[6]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[7]  T. Hall.  Ethnography: Principles in Practice. By M. Hammersley & P. Atkinson. Pp. 323. (Routledge, London, 1995.) , 1997, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[8]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[9]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Interactive systems: bridging the gaps between developers and users , 1991, Computer.

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[11]  Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn,et al.  Motivational profiles of toolkit users - iPhone and Android developers , 2011 .

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[13]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[14]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[15]  Helen Sharp,et al.  Ethnographically-informed empirical studies of software practice , 2007, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[16]  Kevin J. Boudreau.  UNPAID COMPLEMENTORS AND NETWORK EFFECTS? EVIDENCE FROM ON-LINE MULTI-PLAYER GAMES , 2011 .