论文信息 - How would your favourite user model cope with these scenarios?

How would your favourite user model cope with these scenarios?

In a paper presented at the 1987 CHI conference (Young & Barnard, 1987), we proposed the use of scenarios as one methodological route to the development of user models of broader scope. In this article we summarise the argument and present five such scenarios as a challenge to the state of the art in user modelling. We invite the reader to ponder the question: How well would your favourite user modelling technique handle some, most, or all of these scenarios? And have you any further scenarios to add to those presented here?

[1] R. M. Young,et al. The use of scenarios in human-computer interaction research: turbocharging the tortoise of cumulative science , 1987, CHI '87.

[2] Allen Newell,et al. SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[3] Richard M. Young,et al. The use of scenarios in human-computer interaction research: turbocharging the tortoise of cumulative science , 1987, CHI 1987.

[4] Richard M. Young,et al. Programmable user models for predictive evaluation of interface designs , 1989, CHI '89.

[5] Thomas K. Landauer,et al. Relations between cognitive psychology and computer system design , 1990 .

[6] Philip J. Barnard,et al. Cognitive resources and the learning of human-computer dialogs , 1987 .

[7] Tony J. Simon,et al. Analyzing the Scope of Cognitive Models in Human-Computer Interaction: A Trade-Off Approach , 1988, BCS HCI.

[8] Allen Newell,et al. The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[9] Stephen J. Payne,et al. Task-Action Grammars: A Model of the Mental Representation of Task Languages , 1987, SGCH.

[10] A. Newell. Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .