Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaveric investigation

The longevity of total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to improve with advancements in design and bearing materials. However, the incidence of dislocation and impingement-related failures continue to rise, with the inability of the surgeon to achieve optimal component orientation cited as a cause. Computer-assistance has been shown to increase the accuracy of component orientation and robotic-assistance has been developed to translate this advantage into precise surgical execution. We sought to validate a haptically-guided robotic arm system in performing THA with the aim of comparing the accuracy of robotic-assisted acetabular cup placement to manual placement. We implanted 12 acetabular components in 6 cadaveric pelvises comparing robotic-assistance on one side with manual implantation on the other. We measured planned and actual center of rotation (COR), cup position, leg-length equalization and offset for each THA using computed tomography and the robotic platform. The root-mean-square (RMS) error for the robotic-assisted system was within 3° for cup placement and within 1mm for leg-length equalization and offset when compared to computed tomography. The robotic-assisted system was significantly more accurate than manual implantation in reproducing the COR and cup orientation, as determined by a preoperative plan. The RMS error for manual implantation compared to robotic-assistance was 5 times higher for cup inclination and 3.4 times higher for cup anteversion (p < 0.01). Robotic-assistance is more accurate than manual implantation in achieving optimal cup orientation. It has the ability to eliminate human error from THA and should be considered in light of THA failures due to component malposition.

[1]  J. W. Park,et al.  Comparison of total hip replacement with and without cement in patients younger than 50 years of age: the results at 18 years. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  L. Dorr,et al.  Hip Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Quantitative Measurement with Navigation , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  P. Herberts,et al.  Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part I. General health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  D. Murray.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  D. Padgett,et al.  Effectiveness of an Acetabular Positioning Device in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2005, HSS Journal.

[7]  M. Maynard,et al.  Modern technique of cemented total hip arthroplasty , 1991 .

[8]  Kevin Ong,et al.  The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  L. Dorr,et al.  Wear and range of motion of different femoral head sizes. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  Elena Losina,et al.  Incidence Rates of Dislocation, Pulmonary Embolism, and Deep Infection During the First Six Months After Elective Total Hip Replacement , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Yue Li,et al.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Medicare patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, 1991-2008. , 2011, JAMA.

[12]  Martin Haimerl,et al.  Minimally invasive computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty, following the concept of femur first and combined anteversion: design of a blinded randomized controlled trial , 2011, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[13]  Rupesh Tarwala,et al.  Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty using the MAKO platform , 2011, Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine.

[14]  Aamer Malik,et al.  Precision and Bias of Imageless Computer Navigation and Surgeon Estimates for Acetabular Component Position , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  A. Wines,et al.  Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  A. Schulz,et al.  Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures , 2007, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[17]  Henrik Malchau,et al.  The John Charnley Award: Risk Factors for Cup Malpositioning: Quality Improvement Through a Joint Registry at a Tertiary Hospital , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  L. Dorr,et al.  Quantification of Pelvic Tilt in Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  L. Dorr,et al.  A comparison of surgeon estimation and computed tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.