Canine Retina Has a Primate Fovea-Like Bouquet of Cone Photoreceptors Which Is Affected by Inherited Macular Degenerations

Retinal areas of specialization confer vertebrates with the ability to scrutinize corresponding regions of their visual field with greater resolution. A highly specialized area found in haplorhine primates (including humans) is the fovea centralis which is defined by a high density of cone photoreceptors connected individually to interneurons, and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) that are offset to form a pit lacking retinal capillaries and inner retinal neurons at its center. In dogs, a local increase in RGC density is found in a topographically comparable retinal area defined as the area centralis. While the canine retina is devoid of a foveal pit, no detailed examination of the photoreceptors within the area centralis has been reported. Using both in vivo and ex vivo imaging, we identified a retinal region with a primate fovea-like cone photoreceptor density but without the excavation of the inner retina. Similar anatomical structure observed in rare human subjects has been named fovea-plana. In addition, dogs with mutations in two different genes, that cause macular degeneration in humans, developed earliest disease at the newly-identified canine fovea-like area. Our results challenge the dogma that within the phylogenetic tree of mammals, haplorhine primates with a fovea are the sole lineage in which the retina has a central bouquet of cones. Furthermore, a predilection for naturally-occurring retinal degenerations to alter this cone-enriched area fills the void for a clinically-relevant animal model of human macular degenerations.

[1]  R. Clark,et al.  The effects of time, luminance, and high contrast targets: revisiting grating acuity in the domestic cat. , 2013, Experimental eye research.

[2]  Adam M. Dubis,et al.  Adaptation of the central retina for high acuity vision: Cones, the fovea and the avascular zone , 2013, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[3]  Alexander Sumaroka,et al.  Human retinal gene therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis shows advancing retinal degeneration despite enduring visual improvement , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Stephen A. Burns,et al.  Foveal Avascular Zone and Its Relationship to Foveal Pit Shape , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  G. Acland,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic variations of inherited retinal diseases in dogs: the power of within- and across-breed studies , 2012, Mammalian Genome.

[6]  Hemant Khanna,et al.  Gene therapy rescues photoreceptor blindness in dogs and paves the way for treating human X-linked retinitis pigmentosa , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Foveal cone density shows a rapid postnatal maturation in the marmoset monkey , 2011, Visual Neuroscience.

[8]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Assessment of canine BEST1 variations identifies new mutations and establishes an independent bestrophinopathy model (cmr3) , 2010, Molecular vision.

[9]  Kaccie Y. Li,et al.  Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  S. Jacobson,et al.  The genomic, biochemical, and cellular responses of the retina in inherited photoreceptor degenerations and prospects for the treatment of these disorders. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  D. M. Tait,et al.  Arrested development: High-resolution imaging of foveal morphology in albinism , 2010, Vision Research.

[12]  E. Rossi,et al.  The relationship between visual resolution and cone spacing in the human fovea , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Moore,et al.  Childhood macular dystrophies , 2009, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[14]  Anand Swaroop,et al.  Unraveling a multifactorial late-onset disease: from genetic susceptibility to disease mechanisms for age-related macular degeneration. , 2009, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[15]  B. J. Klevering,et al.  The spectrum of ocular phenotypes caused by mutations in the BEST1 gene , 2009, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[16]  W. Beltran The use of canine models of inherited retinal degeneration to test novel therapeutic approaches. , 2009, Veterinary ophthalmology.

[17]  P. Luthert,et al.  Topographical characterization of cone photoreceptors and the area centralis of the canine retina , 2008, Molecular vision.

[18]  J. Ott,et al.  Rhesus monkeys and humans share common susceptibility genes for age-related macular disease. , 2008, Human molecular genetics.

[19]  Robert J Zawadzki,et al.  Visual insignificance of the foveal pit: reassessment of foveal hypoplasia as fovea plana. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  J. Gonzalez-Martinez,et al.  Maculas, monkeys, models, AMD and aging , 2008, Vision Research.

[21]  T. Lamb,et al.  Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  G. Acland,et al.  Bestrophin gene mutations cause canine multifocal retinopathy: a novel animal model for best disease. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  G. Acland,et al.  A frameshift mutation in RPGR exon ORF15 causes photoreceptor degeneration and inner retina remodeling in a model of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  David Williams,et al.  The locus of fixation and the foveal cone mosaic. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[25]  Alexander Sumaroka,et al.  In vivo dynamics of retinal injury and repair in the rhodopsin mutant dog model of human retinitis pigmentosa. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A D Springer,et al.  Development of the primate area of high acuity, 3: Temporal relationships between pit formation, retinal elongation and cone packing , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[27]  David Williams,et al.  Functional photoreceptor loss revealed with adaptive optics: an alternate cause of color blindness. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  A. Harman,et al.  A Strong Correlation Exists between the Distribution of Retinal Ganglion Cells and Nose Length in the Dog , 2003, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[29]  G. Acland,et al.  Different RPGR exon ORF15 mutations in Canids provide insights into photoreceptor cell degeneration. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[30]  R. Masland The fundamental plan of the retina , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  B. Finlay,et al.  Conservation of Absolute Foveal Area in New World Monkeys , 2000, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[32]  Helga Kolb,et al.  The mammalian photoreceptor mosaic-adaptive design , 2000, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[33]  L. Molday,et al.  ABCR expression in foveal cone photoreceptors and its role in Stargardt macular dystrophy , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[34]  P K Ahnelt,et al.  The photoreceptor mosaic , 1998, Eye.

[35]  D. Mutti,et al.  Effect of optical defocus on visual acuity in dogs. , 1997, American journal of veterinary research.

[36]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  Analysis of the retinas and optic nerves of achiasmatic belgian sheepdogs , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  David J. Calkins,et al.  M and L cones in macaque fovea connect to midget ganglion cells by different numbers of excitatory synapses , 1994, Nature.

[38]  W. Dawson,et al.  Visual resolution in normal and glaucomatous dogs determined by pattern electroretinogram , 1993 .

[39]  L. Peichl,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in the dog and wolf retina. , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[40]  P. Rakić,et al.  Distribution of photoreceptor subtypes in the retina of diurnal and nocturnal primates , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[42]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  Photoreceptor mosaic: Number and distribution of rods and cones in the rhesus monkey retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[43]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[44]  G. M. Hope,et al.  Adult-onset macular degeneration in the Cayo Santiago macaques. , 1989, Puerto Rico health sciences journal.

[45]  P. Buisseret,et al.  Area centralis position relative to the optic disc projection in kittens as a function of age. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[46]  L P O'Keefe,et al.  Schematic eyes for domestic animals * , 1988, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[47]  G. Fishman,et al.  X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Profile of clinical findings. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[48]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. , 1987, Science.

[49]  J. Stone,et al.  The area centralis of the retina in the cat and other mammals: Focal point for function and development of the visual system , 1984, Neuroscience.

[50]  J. Odom,et al.  Canine visual acuity: retinal and cortical field potentials evoked by pattern stimulation. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[51]  Rudolf Hebel,et al.  Distribution of retinal ganglion cells in five mammalian species (pig, sheep, ox, horse, dog) , 1976, Anatomy and Embryology.

[52]  A Hughes,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the cat retinal ganglion cell topography , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[53]  A. Bird,et al.  X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. , 1973, Transactions - American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[54]  R. H. Steinberg,et al.  The distribution of rods and cones in the retina of the cat (Felis domesticus) , 1973, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[55]  J. Stone,et al.  Receptor pedicle density in the cat's retina. , 1972, Brain research.

[56]  W. Neuhaus,et al.  Über die Sehschärfe des Haushundes bei verschiedenen Helligkeiten , 1967, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[57]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  THE SCHEMATIC EYE IN THE CAT. , 1963, Vision research.

[58]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co‐ordinates and optics , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[59]  Henrik Sjögren,et al.  ZUR KENNTNIS DER KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS SICCA II , 1935 .

[60]  William Fischer,et al.  Race- and sex-related differences in retinal thickness and foveal pit morphology. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[61]  R. Vautin,et al.  Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[62]  R. D. Whitley,et al.  Utilizing an optokinetic device in assessing the functional visual acuity of the dog , 1990 .

[63]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Peak density and distribution of ganglion cells in the retinae of microchiropteran bats: implications for visual acuity. , 1988, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[64]  T. P. Lesiuk,et al.  Fine structure of the canine tapetum lucidum. , 1983, Journal of anatomy.

[65]  B. Dreher,et al.  Functional morphology of beta cells in the area centralis of the cat's retina: a model for the evolution of central retinal specializations. , 1982, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[66]  A. Hughes The Topography of Vision in Mammals of Contrasting Life Style: Comparative Optics and Retinal Organisation , 1977 .

[67]  J. H. Chievitz Untersuchungen über die Area centralis retinae , 1889 .

[68]  Detmar Wilhelm Soemmerring De oculorum hominis animaliumque sectione horizontali : Commentatio , 1818 .