A Methodology for Assessing Organizational Core Values

The goal of this study is to offer a methodology for empirically assessing the core values of an organization. It uses means-end analysis in order to determine those values that organization members manifest in their daily behaviour, and which are not just espoused 'truisms'. The method is based on the sense members of an organization make of what they do. Sensemaking follows a means-end pattern, through which individual actions converge into central values. The values most central in this means-end structure are the core values that effectively motivate organization members in their job. Our method works in two steps: first, exploratory interviews using the laddering-technique establish the values potentially most central to the organization; then, a follow-up survey assesses the complete pattern of means-end relations among the potential values. Validity tests show that the most central values derived from this survey data are the most important to organization members. These values are also the most stable over time. We make a comparison of this method with traditional value surveys and we discuss its implications for the study of organizational behaviour. Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2006.

[1]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[2]  David Sims,et al.  Thinking in organizations , 1979 .

[3]  Smarter Workflow,et al.  Built to Last , 2007 .

[4]  C. Eden,et al.  Analysing and comparing idiographic causal maps , 1998 .

[5]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Motivated decision making: effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  E. R. Hammer.  Research in Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[7]  James C. Collins,et al.  Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies , 1994 .

[8]  T. J. Reynolds,et al.  Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. , 2001 .

[9]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Some Contemporary Approaches , 1964 .

[10]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[11]  Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al.  Individual Values in Organizations: Concepts, Controversies, and Research , 1998 .

[12]  H. H. Kassarjian.  Content Analysis in Consumer Research , 1977 .

[13]  T. J. Reynolds,et al.  Understanding consumer decision making : the means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy , 2001 .

[14]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Scripts as Determinants of Purposeful Behavior in Organizations , 1987 .

[15]  M. Rokeach.  The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[16]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Discursive psychology: An alternative conceptual foundation to means–end chain theory , 2000 .

[17]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[18]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Alternatives to difference scores as dependent variables in the study of congruence in organizational research. , 1995 .

[19]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  THE DOMINANT LOGIC: RETROSPECTIVE AND EXTENSION , 1995 .

[20]  James M. Olson,et al.  Addressing discrepancies between values and behavior:the motivating effect of reasons , 2001 .

[21]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[22]  W. Ouchi.  A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[23]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  The Organizational Transformation Process: The Micropolitics of Dissonance Reduction and the Allignment of Logics of Action , 1996 .

[24]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Mapping Strategic Thought. , 1992 .

[25]  Van Riel,et al.  Principles of Corporate Communication , 1995 .

[26]  Olaf G. Rughase.  What is Organizational Identity , 2006 .

[27]  James M. Olson,et al.  Values as truisms:evidence and implications , 1998 .

[28]  Gerry Johnson,et al.  Entrepreneurial Intentions and Outcomes: A Comparative Causal Mapping Study , 1997 .

[29]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  Response Rate in Academic Studies — A Comparative Analysis , 1999 .

[30]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[31]  John S. Oakland,et al.  The impact of telephone notification strategies on response to an industrial mail survey , 1985 .

[32]  J. L. Stimpert.  Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Theory, Methods and Research , 1999 .

[33]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[34]  D. Bernstein.  Company Image and Reality : A Critique of Corporate Communications , 1985 .

[35]  M. Bougon.  Cognition in Organizations: An Analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. , 1977 .

[36]  R. Lachman,et al.  Value Incongruity and Strategic Choice , 1998 .

[37]  J. Dwyer,et al.  Statistical Models for the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1983 .

[38]  C. Eden.  Strategy development as a social process , 1992 .

[39]  C. Eden,et al.  The analysis of cause maps , 1992 .

[40]  Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al.  The transitivity of work values: Hierarchical preference ordering of socially desirable stimuli , 1989 .

[41]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[42]  Baron,et al.  Protected Values , 1997, Virology.

[43]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Alternative Approaches for Measuring Values: Direct and Indirect Assessments in Performance Prediction , 2002 .

[44]  L. Christman.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1977 .

[45]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Regular ArticleProtected Values , 1997 .

[46]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  The Future of Work Motivation Theory , 2004 .

[47]  J. Walsh.  Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane , 1995 .

[48]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[49]  J. Gutman.  A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes , 1982 .

[50]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Introduction to special topic forum: The future of work motivation theory. , 2004 .

[51]  Susan C. Schneider,et al.  Cognition in Organizational Analysis: Who's Minding the Store? , 1993 .

[52]  Richard T. Serpe,et al.  Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? , 1994 .

[53]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[54]  T. J. Reynolds,et al.  Advancements in Laddering , 2001 .