Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests

Completely mixed batch reactors were used to compare the methane production from maize at inoculum to substrate volatile solids ratios (r(l/s)) of 3, 2, 1.5 and 1. The tests were carried out at 35 degrees C and run against a control of inoculum without substrate. The stability and progress of the reaction from solid substrate to gaseous end product was monitored by measuring the pH, soluble chemical oxygen demand (CODs), total alkalinity (TA), volatile fatty acids (VFA) and gas composition on a daily basis. The results showed that the yield coefficient showed little variation over the range used, with an average value of 211 +/- 6 ml CH4 at standard temperature and pressure (STP) conditions g VSadded.-1 The methane added production curves were further analysed to give values for the maximum specific methane production rate, ranging from 10 ml CH4 a. VSS-1 day(-1) for a r(l/s) of 3-23 ml CH4 g VSS-1 day(-1) for a r(1/s) of 1. The initial buffering capacity of the system was enhanced by addition of NaHCO3 to 9 100 mg CaCO3 1(-1) which allowed digestion to proceed within the pH range 7.2-8.0 and at TVFA to TA ratio below the critical limit of 0.4. The largest proportion of the CODs was in the form of VFA and the reactor with the highest VS loading showed an accumulation of longer chain acids.

[1]  D. M. Sievers,et al.  Buffer stability in manure digesters , 1982 .

[2]  I. Angelidaki,et al.  Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants , 2004 .

[3]  Perry L. McCarty,et al.  Methane fermentation of selected lignocellulosic materials. , 1990 .

[4]  L. Neves,et al.  Influence of inoculum activity on the bio-methanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculum ratios , 2004 .

[5]  W. Lopes,et al.  Influence of inoculum on performance of anaerobic reactors for treating municipal solid waste. , 2004, Bioresource technology.

[6]  J. M. Owens,et al.  Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks , 1993 .

[7]  O. Yenigün,et al.  Determination of potential methane production capacity of a granular sludge from a pilot‐scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor using a specific methanogenic activity test , 2001 .

[8]  A. Guwy.  Equipment used for testing anaerobic biodegradability and activity , 2004 .

[9]  J. Lema,et al.  Degradation of volatile fatty acids by differently enriched methanogenic cultures: Kinetics and inhibition , 1995 .

[10]  A. Kivaisi,et al.  Application of rumen microorganisms for enhanced anaerobic degradation of bagasse and maize bran , 1995 .

[11]  S. R. Jenkins,et al.  Measuring anaerobic sludge digestion and growth by a simple alkalimetric titration , 1983 .

[12]  Andrew G. Hashimoto,et al.  Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on methane yield and production rate from straw , 1988 .

[13]  V. Gunaseelan.  Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review , 1997 .

[14]  Alberto Rozzi,et al.  Methods of assessing microbial activity and inhibition under anaerobic conditions: a literature review , 2004 .

[15]  Qunhui Wang,et al.  Degradation of volatile fatty acids in highly efficient anaerobic digestion , 1999 .

[16]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[17]  D. J. Stewart,et al.  Biogas production from crops and organic wastes. 1. Results of batch digestions. , 1979 .

[18]  P. Mccarty,et al.  Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity , 1979 .