A model invalidation-based approach for elucidating biological signalling pathways, applied to the chemotaxis pathway in R. sphaeroides

BackgroundDeveloping methods for understanding the connectivity of signalling pathways is a major challenge in biological research. For this purpose, mathematical models are routinely developed based on experimental observations, which also allow the prediction of the system behaviour under different experimental conditions. Often, however, the same experimental data can be represented by several competing network models.ResultsIn this paper, we developed a novel mathematical model/experiment design cycle to help determine the probable network connectivity by iteratively invalidating models corresponding to competing signalling pathways. To do this, we systematically design experiments in silico that discriminate best between models of the competing signalling pathways. The method determines the inputs and parameter perturbations that will differentiate best between model outputs, corresponding to what can be measured/observed experimentally. We applied our method to the unknown connectivities in the chemotaxis pathway of the bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. We first developed several models of R. sphaeroides chemotaxis corresponding to different signalling networks, all of which are biologically plausible. Parameters in these models were fitted so that they all represented wild type data equally well. The models were then compared to current mutant data and some were invalidated. To discriminate between the remaining models we used ideas from control systems theory to determine efficiently in silico an input profile that would result in the biggest difference in model outputs. However, when we applied this input to the models, we found it to be insufficient for discrimination in silico. Thus, to achieve better discrimination, we determined the best change in initial conditions (total protein concentrations) as well as the best change in the input profile. The designed experiments were then performed on live cells and the resulting data used to invalidate all but one of the remaining candidate models.ConclusionWe successfully applied our method to chemotaxis in R. sphaeroides and the results from the experiments designed using this methodology allowed us to invalidate all but one of the proposed network models. The methodology we present is general and can be applied to a range of other biological networks.

[1]  George M. Siouris,et al.  Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  Judith P. Armitage,et al.  Inducible-Expression Plasmid for Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Paracoccus denitrificans , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[3]  M. Surette,et al.  Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  Antonis Papachristodoulou,et al.  Efficient, sparse biological network determination , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[5]  Judith P. Armitage,et al.  Polar Localization of CheA2 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Requires Specific Che Homologs , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  F. Doyle,et al.  A benchmark for methods in reverse engineering and model discrimination: problem formulation and solutions. , 2004, Genome research.

[7]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[8]  Judith P Armitage,et al.  The CheYs of Rhodobacter sphaeroides* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  Design and Diversity in Bacterial Chemotaxis: A Comparative Study in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis , 2004, PLoS biology.

[10]  W R SISTROM,et al.  A requirement for sodium in the growth of Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. , 1960, Journal of general microbiology.

[11]  B. Palsson The challenges of in silico biology , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Judith P. Armitage,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Rhodobacter Sphaeroides Flagellum , 1990 .

[13]  J. Timmer,et al.  Systems biology: experimental design , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[14]  Laura Camarena,et al.  Biochemical Study of Multiple CheY Response Regulators of the Chemotactic Pathway of Rhodobacter sphaeroides , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  Judith P Armitage,et al.  Phosphotransfer in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Antonis Papachristodoulou,et al.  A New Computational Tool for Establishing Model Parameter Identifiability , 2009, J. Comput. Biol..

[17]  Antonis Papachristodoulou,et al.  On validation and invalidation of biological models , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  Judith P. Armitage,et al.  Control of the protonmotive force in Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides in the light and dark and its effect on the initiation of flagellar rotation , 1985 .

[19]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[20]  Judith P. Armitage Control of the unidirectional motor in Rhodobacter sphaeroides , 2009 .

[21]  Steven P. Asprey,et al.  On the design of optimally informative dynamic experiments for model discrimination in multiresponse nonlinear situations , 2003 .

[22]  J M Pemberton,et al.  An improved suicide vector for construction of chromosomal insertion mutations in bacteria. , 1992, Gene.

[23]  J P Armitage,et al.  Fine tuning bacterial chemotaxis: analysis of Rhodobacter sphaeroides behaviour under aerobic and anaerobic conditions by mutation of the major chemotaxis operons and cheY genes , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[24]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Targeting of two signal transduction pathways to different regions of the bacterial cell , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  R. Schmitt,et al.  Phosphotransfer between CheA, CheY1, and CheY2 in the chemotaxis signal transduction chain of Rhizobium meliloti. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[26]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[27]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[28]  S. L. Porter,et al.  Rhodobacter sphaeroides: complexity in chemotactic signalling. , 2008, Trends in microbiology.

[29]  Judith P Armitage,et al.  Chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Requires an Atypical Histidine Protein Kinase* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  Ursula Klingmüller,et al.  Simulation Methods for Optimal Experimental Design in Systems Biology , 2003, Simul..

[31]  Bruce A. Francis,et al.  Feedback Control Theory , 1992 .

[32]  Maksat Ashyraliyev,et al.  Systems biology: parameter estimation for biochemical models , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[33]  Gene F. Franklin,et al.  Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems , 1986 .

[34]  Drew Endy,et al.  Stimulus Design for Model Selection and Validation in Cell Signaling , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..