A heuristic method to determine optimum degree of activity accelerating and overlapping in schedule compression

Schedule compression is an attempt to reduce project durations for early delivery, or to catch up on occurred delays. This is usually performed using “crashing”, “overlapping” and “substitution” of activities. “Crashing” is shortening task duration by adding more resource hours. “Substitution” is changing the method or tool by which the activity is performed. “Overlapping” is performing sequential activities in parallel. Few studies can be found in the literature that compare costs and benefits of each technique and recommend the optimum combination of these techniques in project schedules. In fact, the implications of each technique are inherently different since crashing and substitution impose extra cost whereas overlapping adds the risk of changes and rework. Therefore, it is a challenge to develop a reliable analytical tool for performing time–cost trade-offs using the three methods. There are also few studies in the literature to propose a practical method for performing schedule compression by comb...

[1]  Chung-Wei Feng,et al.  Stochastic construction time-cost trade-off analysis , 2000 .

[2]  J. Y. Ruwanpura,et al.  The Mechanism of Design Activity Overlapping in Construction Projects and the Time-Cost Tradeoff Function , 2011 .

[3]  Chung-Wei Feng,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems , 1997 .

[4]  Tarek Hegazy Optimization of construction time-cost trade-off analysis using genetic algorithms , 1999 .

[5]  Awad S. Hanna,et al.  Impact of extended overtime on construction labor productivity , 2005 .

[6]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[7]  H R Thomas,et al.  LOSS OF CONSTRUCTION LABOR PRODUCTIVITY DUE TO INEFFICIENCIES AND DISRUPTIONS: THE WEIGHT OF EXPERT OPINION , 1990 .

[8]  Janaka Y. Ruwanpura,et al.  Optimum Activity Overlapping using Genetic Algorithms , 2011, ISEC 2011.

[9]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  Framework for improving workflow stability: deployment of optimized capacity buffers in a synchronized construction production , 2014 .

[10]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Using improved genetic algorithms to facilitate time-cost optimization , 1997 .

[11]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Applying a Genetic Algorithm-Based Multiobjective Approach for Time-Cost Optimization , 2004 .

[12]  Ying Xiong,et al.  Applying an Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm-Based Multiobjective Approach for Time–Cost Trade-Off , 2008 .

[13]  HaziniKamran,et al.  An evolutionary optimization method to determine optimum degree of activity accelerating and overlapping in schedule compression , 2014 .

[14]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Concurrent Crashing and Overlapping in Product Development , 2004, Oper. Res..

[15]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Concurrent Engineering Approach to Reducing Design Delivery Time , 2005 .

[16]  Nicolai Siemens A Simple CPM Time-Cost Tradeoff Algorithm , 1971 .

[17]  Raad Yahya Qassim,et al.  Project Acceleration via Activity Crashing, Overlapping, and Substitution , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  H. Randolph Thomas,et al.  SCHEDULED OVERTIME AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS , 1997 .