An Investigation into the Prominence of Spiral Galaxy Bulges

From a diameter-limited sample of 86 low-inclination (face-on) spiral galaxies, the bulge-to-disk size and luminosity ratios and other quantitative measurements for the prominence of the bulge are derived. The bulge and disk parameters have been estimated using a seeing-convolved Sersic r1/n bulge and a seeing-convolved exponential disk that were fitted to the optical (B, R, and I) and near-infrared (K) galaxy light profiles. In general, early-type spiral galaxy bulges have Sersic values of n > 1, and late-type spiral galaxy bulges have values of n 3 σ) for the early-type spirals than for the late-type spirals. Two new parameters are introduced to measure the prominence of the bulge. The first is the difference between the central surface brightness of the galaxy and the surface brightness level at which the bulge and disk contribute equally. The other test uses the radius at which the contribution from the disk and bulge light are equal, normalized for the effect of intrinsically different galaxy sizes. Both of these parameters reveal that the early-type spiral galaxies appear to have significantly (more than 2 σ in all passbands) bigger and brighter bulges than late-type spiral galaxies. This apparent contradiction with the re/h values can be explained with an iceberg-like scenario, in which the bulges in late-type spiral galaxies are relatively submerged in their disk. This can be achieved by varying the relative stellar density while maintaining the same effective bulge-to-disk ratio. The B/D luminosity ratio and the concentration index C31, in agreement with past studies, are positively correlated and decrease as one moves along the spiral Hubble sequence toward later spiral galaxy types, although for galaxies with large extended bulges the concentration index no longer traces the B/D luminosity ratio in a one-to-one fashion. A strong (Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient, rs = 0.80) and highly significant positive correlation exists between the shape, n, of the bulge light profile and the bulge-to-disk luminosity ratio. The absolute bulge magnitude–log n diagram is used as a diagnostic tool for comparative studies with dwarf elliptical and ordinary elliptical galaxies. At least in the B band these objects occupy distinctly different regions of this parameter space. While the dwarf elliptical galaxies appear to be the faint extension to the brighter elliptical galaxies, the bulges of spiral galaxies do not; for a given luminosity they have a noticeably smaller shape parameter and hence a more dramatic decline of stellar density at large radii.

[1]  S. Okamura,et al.  Digital surface photometry of galaxies toward a quantitative classification. III. A mean concentration index as a parameter representing the luminosity distribution. , 1984 .

[2]  D. Schlegel,et al.  Maps of Dust IR Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and CMBR Foregrounds , 1997, astro-ph/9710327.

[3]  J. Schombert The structure of brightest cluster members. I: Surface photometry , 1986 .

[4]  Some effects of galaxy structure and dynamics on the Fundamental Plane – II. A Virgo–Fornax distance modulus , 1998, astro-ph/9801143.

[5]  R. Saglia,et al.  The effects of seeing on the photometric properties of elliptical galaxies , 1993 .

[6]  R. Davies,et al.  Spectroscopy and photometry of elliptical galaxies. I: a new distance estimator , 1987 .

[7]  W. W. Morgan Some Characteristics of Galaxies. , 1962 .

[8]  C. Pritchet,et al.  On the optical appearance of distant galaxies. , 1981 .

[9]  J. Lucey,et al.  A new, age-independent distance indicator for elliptical galaxies , 1993 .

[10]  Francisco Valdes,et al.  The Morphologies of Distant Galaxies. I. an Automated Classification System , 1994 .

[11]  E. Corsini,et al.  Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies , 2000 .

[12]  L. Costa,et al.  Extinction in SC galaxies , 1994 .

[13]  B. Lanzoni,et al.  The tilt of the fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies — I. Exploring dynamical and structural effects , 1996, astro-ph/9601100.

[14]  S. Faber Nearly Normal Galaxies , 1987 .

[15]  J. Schombert,et al.  The methodology and reliability of determining bulge-to-disk ratios for spiral galaxies , 1987 .

[16]  M. Colless,et al.  Some effects of galaxy structure and dynamics on the Fundamental Plane , 1997, astro-ph/9701020.

[17]  C. Heiles,et al.  Reddening estimates for galaxies in the Second Reference Catalog and the Uppsala General Catalog , 1984 .

[18]  R. D. Jong Near-infrared and optical broadband surface photometry of 86 face-on disk dominated galaxies. ?;?? II. A two-dimensional method to determine bulge and disk parameters , 1996, astro-ph/9601002.

[19]  S. Faber,et al.  Global Scaling Relations for Elliptical Galaxies and Implications for Formation , 1987 .

[20]  Y. Wadadekar,et al.  Correlations among Global Photometric Properties of Disk Galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9911402.

[21]  R. Peletier,et al.  THE SHAPE OF THE LUMINOSITY PROFILES OF BULGES OF SPIRAL GALAXIES , 1995 .

[22]  G. de Vaucouleurs,et al.  Systematics of Bulge-to-Disk Ratios , 1986 .

[23]  J. Aguerri,et al.  Structural Components of NGC 5850. , 1997 .

[24]  M. Prieto,et al.  On the Light-Profiles of Spiral Galaxy Bulges and the Hubble Sequence for Spirals , 1999 .

[25]  M. Gregg Stellar population-induced peculiar velocities of elliptical galaxies , 1991 .

[26]  J. Hjorth,et al.  Small Deviations from the R 1/4 Law, the Fundamental Plane, and Phase Densities of Elliptical Galaxies , 1994, astro-ph/9412076.

[27]  M. Currie,et al.  A new extragalactic distance indicator based on the surface brightness profiles of dwarf elliptical galaxies , 1994 .

[28]  On the Shape of the Light Profiles of Early Type Galaxies - Part Two - the - Diagram , 1993, astro-ph/9309013.

[29]  Mamoru Doi,et al.  Morphological classification of galaxies using simple photometric parameters , 1993 .

[30]  S. Djorgovski,et al.  Fundamental Properties of Elliptical Galaxies , 1987 .

[31]  D. Schlegel,et al.  Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds , 1998 .

[32]  R. Bender,et al.  Dynamically hot galaxies. I - Structural properties , 1992 .

[33]  M. Capaccioli Distribution of Light: Outer Regions , 1987 .

[34]  N. Caldwell,et al.  Dwarf elliptical galaxies in the Fornax cluster. II - Their structure and stellar populations , 1987 .

[35]  Lubos Perek,et al.  Evolution of galaxies , 2007 .

[36]  W. W. Morgan PRELIMINARY CLASSIFICATION OF THE FORMS OF GALAXIES ACCORDING TO THEIR STELLAR POPULATION. II , 1958 .

[37]  K. Freeman,et al.  Surface BR Photometry of Newly Discovered Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies in the Nearby Sculptor and Centaurus A Groups , 2000 .

[38]  S. Courteau,et al.  Evidence for Secular Evolution in Late-Type Spirals , 1995, astro-ph/9512026.

[39]  M. Fukugita,et al.  Morphology classification of galaxies in CL 0939+4713 using a ground-based telescope image , 1995 .

[40]  The entropy of elliptical galaxies in Coma: a clue for a distance indicator , 1997, astro-ph/9701078.

[41]  D. Block,et al.  Toward a New Millennium in Galaxy Morphology , 2000 .

[42]  T. Lauer,et al.  Brightest Cluster Galaxy Profile Shapes , 1996, astro-ph/9603006.

[43]  Near-infrared surface photometry of early-type spiral galaxies - I. Bulge and disk decomposition , 1998, astro-ph/9802144.

[44]  N. Caon,et al.  On the shape of the light profiles of early type galaxies – II. The $(D_\text n/A_\text e)-\langle\mu\rangle_\text e$ diagram , 1994 .

[45]  O. Lahav,et al.  Galaxies, Human Eyes, and Artificial Neural Networks , 1994, Science.

[46]  The Ursa Major Cluster of Galaxies. II. Bimodality of the Distribution of Central Surface Brightnesses , 1997, astro-ph/9703029.

[47]  William Wilson Morgan,et al.  A SPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES , 1957 .

[48]  Jose Luis. Sersic,et al.  Atlas de Galaxias Australes , 1968 .

[49]  M. Prieto,et al.  The Influence of Bulge Profile Shapes on Claims for a Scale-free Hubble Sequence for Spiral Galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9908131.

[50]  S. Phillipps,et al.  Low surface brightness galaxies in the Fornax Cluster - Automated galaxy surface photometry. III , 1988 .

[51]  A. Sandage The Hubble atlas of galaxies , 1961 .

[52]  S. Kent,et al.  CCD surface photometry of field galaxies. II: Bulge/disk decompositions , 1985 .

[53]  J. Kormendy Brightness distributions in compact and normal galaxies. III - Decomposition of observed profiles into spheroid and disk components , 1977 .

[54]  K. Freeman On the disks of spiral and SO Galaxies , 1970 .

[55]  Some Musings on Galaxy Classification , 1997, astro-ph/9703164.

[56]  B. Poggianti K and evolutionary corrections from uv to ir , 1996, astro-ph/9608029.

[57]  S. Okamura,et al.  AN AUTOMATED IMAGE MEASURING SYSTEM , 1992 .

[58]  Quantifying Morphological Evolution from Low to High Redshifts , 2000, astro-ph/0006166.

[59]  R. Bender,et al.  Line-of-sight velocity distributions of elliptical galaxies , 1994 .

[60]  M. Currie,et al.  Distances to 64 Virgo dwarf-elliptical galaxies and the depth in their spatial distribution , 1995 .

[61]  The specific entropy of elliptical galaxies: an explanation for profile‐shape distance indicators? , 1999, astro-ph/9905048.