Structural Analysis of Trabecular Bone of the Proximal Femur Using Multislice Computed Tomography: A Comparison with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry for Predicting Biomechanical Strength In Vitro

We investigated whether trabecular microstructural parameters determined in multislice spiral computed tomographic (MSCT) images of proximal femur specimens differed in male and female donors and improved the prediction of biomechanical strength of the femur compared to bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) determined with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the standard diagnostic technique. Proximal femur specimens (n = 119) were harvested from formalin-fixed human cadavers (mean age 80 ± 10 years). BMD was determined using DXA. Trabecular microstructural parameters (bone volume fraction, fractal dimension, and trabecular thickness, spacing, and number) were calculated in MSCT-derived images of the proximal femur. Failure load (FL) was measured using a biomechanical side-impact test. An age-, height-, and weight-matched subgroup (n = 54) was chosen to compare male and female donors. BMC, BMD, and structural parameters correlated significantly with FL, with r up to 0.75, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively. In a multiple regression model, an increase up to r = 0.82 was obtained when combining trabecular structural parameters and BMC. BMD differed between males and females only at the trochanter. BMC showed significant gender differences in all regions. This experimental study showed that a combination of BMC and microstructural parameters could improve the prediction of FL, suggesting that bone mass and trabecular structure carry overlapping but complementary information and that a combination of the two provides the best prediction of bone strength. Male donors had larger femora even after adjustment for body size and height, but no differences in trabecular structure were found between males and females.

[1]  Horst Lenzen,et al.  Strukturanalyse hochauflösender Computertomogramme als ergänzendes Verfahren in der Osteoporosediagnostik : In-vitro-Untersuchungen an Wirbelsäulensegmenten , 1999 .

[2]  W. Hayes,et al.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Reproducibility and Side Differences of Mechanical Tests for Determining the Structural Strength of the Proximal Femur , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  F. Bonnaire,et al.  Quantitative CT des proximalen Femurs , 1997 .

[5]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Changes in Calcaneal Trabecular Bone Structure Assessed with High-Resolution MR Imaging in Patients with Kidney Transplantation , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[6]  D. Felsenberg,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Proximal Femur Radiographs: Correlation with Biomechanical Properties and Bone Mineral Density , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[7]  L E Claes,et al.  Predictive value of bone mineral density and morphology determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography for cancellous bone strength of the proximal femur. , 2001, Bone.

[8]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Assessment of trabecular structure using high resolution CT images and texture analysis. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Bone Strength at Clinically Relevant Sites Displays Substantial Heterogeneity and Is Best Predicted From Site‐Specific Bone Densitometry , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  H. Genant,et al.  Two new regions of interest to evaluate separately cortical and trabecular BMD in the proximal femur using DXA , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[11]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  L. Claes,et al.  Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  A. Parfitt,et al.  Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo High Resolution MRI of the Calcaneus: Differences in Trabecular Structure in Osteoporosis Patients , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  F Eckstein,et al.  [Multislice-CT for structure analysis of trabecular bone - a comparison with micro-CT and biomechanical strength]. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[16]  G Lowet,et al.  Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry. , 1997, Bone.

[17]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  T. Abbott,et al.  Patients with Prior Fractures Have an Increased Risk of Future Fractures: A Summary of the Literature and Statistical Synthesis , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  Lin Zhang,et al.  Effects of mechanical stress/strain and estrogen on cancellous bone structure predicted by fuzzy decision , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  P Zioupos,et al.  Effect of formaldehyde fixation on some mechanical properties of bovine bone. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[21]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: Relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  A. Silman,et al.  Population-based geographic variations in dxa bone density in Europe: The evos study , 1997, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Local 3D Scaling Properties for the Analysis of Trabecular Bone Extracted from High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Trabecular Bone: Comparison with Bone Mineral Density in the Prediction of Biomechanical Strength In Vitro , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[24]  G. Blake,et al.  Long-Term Precision of DXA Scanning Assessed over Seven Years in Forty Postmenopausal Women , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[25]  F. Bonnaire,et al.  [Quantitative CT assessment of the proximal femur. Experimental studies on its correlation with breaking load in femoral neck fractures]. , 1997, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[26]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Effect of Fixation, Soft-Tissues, and Scan Projection on Bone Mineral Measurements with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) , 2001, Calcified Tissue International.

[27]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: Which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best? , 2003, European Radiology.

[28]  M. Underweiser,et al.  On the fractal nature of trabecular structure. , 1994, Medical physics.

[29]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Pathogenesis of bone fragility in women and men , 2002, The Lancet.

[30]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Structure Analysis of High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Proximal Femur: In Vitro Correlation with Biomechanical Strength and BMD , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[31]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Calcaneus: Age-Related Changes in Trabecular Structure and Comparison with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[32]  A. Alho,et al.  Bending strength of the femur in relation to non-invasive bone mineral assessment. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Correlation of Trabecular Bone Structure with Age, Bone Mineral Density, and Osteoporotic Status: In Vivo Studies in the Distal Radius Using High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[34]  M Fiebich,et al.  [The texture-analysis of high-resolution computed tomograms as an additional procedure in osteoporosis diagnosis: in-vitro studies on vertebral segments]. , 1999, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[35]  G. Henebry,et al.  Lacunarity analysis of spatial pattern in CT images of vertebral trabecular bone for assessing osteoporosis. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[36]  T. Lloyd,et al.  Femoral bone structural geometry adapts to mechanical loading and is influenced by sex steroids: the Penn State Young Women's Health Study. , 2004, Bone.

[37]  F Eckstein,et al.  Mechanical strength of the thoracolumbar spine in the elderly: prediction from in situ dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography (QCT), upper and lower limb peripheral QCT, and quantitative ultrasound. , 2002, Bone.

[38]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Osteoporosis in men: epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. , 2004, Clinical therapeutics.

[39]  X Ouyang,et al.  A Comparative Study of Trabecular Bone Properties in the Spine and Femur Using High Resolution MRI and CT , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[40]  S. Ott,et al.  Should women get screening bone mass measurements? , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[41]  T. Link Changes in trabecular bone structure assessed by high-resolution MRI in patients after transplantation. , 2001, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[42]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Processing and Analysis of In Vivo High-Resolution MR Images of Trabecular Bone for Longitudinal Studies: Reproducibility of Structural Measures and Micro-Finite Element Analysis Derived Mechanical Properties , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[44]  A. Hermann,et al.  Site of Osteodensitometry in Perimenopausal Women: Correlation and Limits of Agreement Between Anatomic Regions , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[45]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Can Novel Clinical Densitometric Techniques Replace or Improve DXA in Predicting Bone Strength in Osteoporosis at the Hip and Other Skeletal Sites? , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[46]  S. A. Jackson,et al.  The Influence of Osteoporotic Fractures on Health-Related Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Men and Women across Canada , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[47]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Local differences in the trabecular bone structure of the proximal femur depicted with high-spatial-resolution MR imaging and multisection CT. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[48]  M. Hahn,et al.  Heterogeneity of the skeleton: Comparison of the trabecular microarchitecture of the spine, the iliac crest, the femur, and the calcaneus , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.