Natural preload of aortic valve leaflet components during glutaraldehyde fixation: effects on tissue mechanics.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G F Tyers,et al. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance. , 1990, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[2] L Gross,et al. Topographic Anatomy and Histology of the Valves in the Human Heart. , 1931, The American journal of pathology.
[3] E. Trowbridge,et al. The standardisation of gauge length: its influence on the relative extensibility of natural and chemically modified pericardium. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.
[4] N. Broom,et al. Simultaneous morphological and stress-strain studies of the fibrous components in wet heart valve leaflet tissue. , 1978, Connective tissue research.
[5] J M Lee,et al. Effect of alternative crosslinking methods on the low strain rate viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardial bioprosthetic material. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[6] I. Vesely. Analysis of the Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve. Effects of "zero-pressure" fixation. , 1991, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[7] B H Smaill,et al. An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second-generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[8] Effect of glutaraldehyde fixation and valve constraint conditions on porcine aortic valve leaflet coaptation. , 1982, Thorax.
[9] D R Boughner,et al. The glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine aortic valve xenograft. I. Tensile viscoelastic properties of the fresh leaflet material. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[10] N. Broom. The observation of collagen and elastin structures in wet whole mounts of pulmonary and aortic leaflets. , 1978, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[11] A A Sauren,et al. Elastic and viscoelastic material behaviour of fresh and glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valve tissue. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.
[12] F. Nistal,et al. Six- to ten-year follow-up of patients with the Hancock cardiac bioprosthesis. Incidence of primary tissue valve failure. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[13] F. Nistal,et al. Comparative study of primary tissue failure between porcine (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) and bovine pericardial (Ionescu-Shiley) bioprostheses in the aortic position at five- to nine-year follow-up. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.
[14] G. Stellin,et al. Performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis following aortic valve replacement: considerations based on a 15-year experience. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[15] F. Schoen. Cardiac valve prostheses: review of clinical status and contemporary biomaterials issues. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[16] A A Sauren,et al. The mechanical properties of porcine aortic valve tissues. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.
[17] F. J. Thomson,et al. Influence of fixation conditions on the performance of glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valves: towards a more scientific basis. , 1979, Thorax.
[18] I. Vesely,et al. Mechanical testing of cryopreserved aortic allografts. Comparison with xenografts and fresh tissue. , 1990, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[19] M. Nimni,et al. Mechanism of crosslinking of proteins by glutaraldehyde II. Reaction with monomeric and polymeric collagen. , 1982, Connective tissue research.
[20] I Vesely,et al. Tissue buckling as a mechanism of bioprosthetic valve failure. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[21] E. Peterson,et al. The porcine bioprosthetic valve. Twelve years later. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[22] V. Ferrans,et al. Porcine aortic valve bioprostheses: a morphologic comparison of the effects of fixation pressure. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[23] I Vesely,et al. Analysis of the bending behaviour of porcine xenograft leaflets and of natural aortic valve material: bending stiffness, neutral axis and shear measurements. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.
[24] M. Thubrikar,et al. Patterns of calcific deposits in operatively excised stenotic or purely regurgitant aortic valves and their relation to mechanical stress. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.
[25] S. Gabbay,et al. Do heart valve bioprostheses degenerate for metabolic or mechanical reasons? , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[26] E. Arbustini,et al. Calcific degeneration as the main cause of porcine bioprosthetic valve failure. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.
[27] H. Rakowski,et al. Survival and bioprosthetic valve failure. Ten-year follow-up. , 1989, Circulation.
[28] G Thiene,et al. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[29] A. Mazzucco,et al. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft. , 1987, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[30] I Vesely,et al. Micromechanics of the fibrosa and the ventricularis in aortic valve leaflets. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.
[31] D R Boughner,et al. The glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine aortic valve xenograft. II. Effect of fixation with or without pressure on the tensile viscoelastic properties of the leaflet material. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[32] M Jones,et al. Structure and classification of cuspal tears and perforations in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves implanted in patients. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.