Modeling shifts in perceived spatial frequency between the fovea and the periphery.

A quantitative multiple-channels model can account for changes in perceived spatial frequency between foveally and peripherally viewed patterns; these frequency shifts are as large as 0.47 octave (38.5%). Factors that change as a function of eccentricity and that can alter the appearance of visual patterns include (1) scaling of receptive-field sizes, (2) overall sensitivity, and (3) steepness and nonlinearity of contrast-transfer functions (CTF's). Computations based on receptive-field size scaling, combined with fixed perceptual labels, predict higher perceived spatial frequency for peripheral patterns. Computations based on reduced sensitivity, however, predict the opposite result and thus partially offset the effect of receptive-field size scaling. The predicted perceived-frequency shifts based on changes in CTF's are quite small and can be ignored. Both individual differences and visual-field-location differences in magnitudes of perceived-frequency shifts are predicted by the model. An alternative perceptual explanation based on size-distance invariance and size constancy is also evaluated.

[1]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency‐selective neurones in the human brain , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  D. Yager,et al.  Comparison of perceived spatial frequency between the fovea and the periphery. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  G E Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in peripheral vision. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[5]  Alfred H. Holway,et al.  Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .

[6]  A. Johnston,et al.  Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual field locus , 1983, Vision Research.

[7]  M. Berkley,et al.  Contrast sensitivity for vertically and obliquely oriented gratings as a function of grating area , 1983, Vision Research.

[8]  H. Wilson,et al.  Modified line-element theory for spatial-frequency and width discrimination. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  J P Thomas,et al.  Detection and identification: how are they related? , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  D. Teller,et al.  Statistical properties of Pollack’s PEST procedure , 1971 .

[11]  D Yager,et al.  Spatial-frequency difference thresholds for central and peripheral viewing. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  H. Wässle,et al.  Size, scatter and coverage of ganglion cell receptive field centres in the cat retina. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  G. J. van der Wildt,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[15]  J. Robson,et al.  Grating summation in fovea and periphery , 1978, Vision Research.

[16]  J. Robson,et al.  Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[17]  A B Watson,et al.  Estimation of local spatial scale. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Contrast matching data predicted from contrast increment thresholds , 1984, Vision Research.

[19]  D. G. Green,et al.  Contrast sensitivity of the human peripheral retina. , 1969, Vision research.

[20]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Locus of spatial-frequency discrimination. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  A. Cowey,et al.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: Implications for central magnification factors , 1985, Vision Research.

[22]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[23]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[24]  E T Davis,et al.  Shifts in perceived spatial frequency of low-contrast stimuli: data and theory. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  R Hilz,et al.  Functional organization of the peripheral retina: sensitivity to periodic stimuli. , 1974, Vision research.

[26]  L. R. Newsome,et al.  Visual angle and apparent size of objects in peripheral vision , 1972 .

[27]  S. Sherman,et al.  Receptive-field characteristics of neurons in cat striate cortex: Changes with visual field eccentricity. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. , 1987, Science.

[29]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  G. Legge.  A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[31]  G. Lennerstrand,et al.  CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL NORMAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FOR STATIC AND DYNAMIC SINUSOIDAL GRATINGS , 1983, Acta ophthalmologica.

[32]  Binocular Moiré Fringes and the Vertical Horopter , 1980, Perception.

[33]  Lothar Spillmann,et al.  Perceptive field size in fovea and periphery of the light- and dark-adapted retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[34]  P. Gouras,et al.  Functional properties of ganglion cells of the rhesus monkey retina. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  B. Cleland,et al.  Visual resolution and receptive field size: examination of two kinds of cat retinal ganglion cell. , 1979, Science.

[36]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  THE PERCEIVED SIZE OF TARGETS IN THE PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL VISUAL FIELDS , 1984, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[37]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Eccentricity dependence of contrast matching and oblique masking , 1985, Vision Research.

[38]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[39]  Apparent size and receptive field properties , 1988, Vision Research.

[40]  N. Graham.  Detection and identification of near-threshold visual patterns. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[41]  M A Georgeson,et al.  Spatial frequency analysis in early visual processing. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[42]  D. Hubel,et al.  Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[43]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The Site of Size Constancy , 1972, Perception.

[44]  Helga Kolb,et al.  Amacrine cells, bipolar cells and ganglion cells of the cat retina: A Golgi study , 1981, Vision Research.

[45]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[46]  C. B. Rubinstein,et al.  A model of threshold vision incorporating inhomogeneity of the visual field , 1977, Vision Research.

[47]  J. Bergen,et al.  A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision , 1979, Vision Research.

[48]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Size Adaptation: A New Aftereffect , 1969, Science.

[49]  S. Klein,et al.  The simultaneous spatial frequency shift: a dissociation between the detection and perception of gratings. , 1974, Vision research.

[50]  A. Johnston,et al.  Spatial scaling of central and peripheral contrast-sensitivity functions. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[51]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision , 1978, Nature.

[52]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Shifts in perceived size as a function of contrast and temporal modulation , 1983, Vision Research.