A European consensus for the evaluation and management of infants with an equivocal diagnosis following newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Screening newborns for cystic fibrosis (CF) is considered to be an ethical undertaking in regions with a significant incidence of the condition. Current screening protocols result in recognition of infants with an equivocal diagnosis. A survey of European practice suggested inconsistencies in the evaluation and management of these infants. We have undertaken a consensus process using a modified Delphi method. This has enabled input of CF specialists from a wide geographical area to a rigorous process that has provided a clear pathway to a consensus statement. A core group produced 21 statements, which were modified over a series of three rounds (including a meeting arranged at the European CF Conference). A final document of 19 statements was produced, all of which achieved a satisfactory level of consensus. The statements cover four themes; sweat testing, further assessments and investigations, review arrangements and database. This consensus document will provide guidance to CF specialists with established screening programmes and those who are in the process of implementing newborn screening in their region.

[1]  J. Dankert-Roelse,et al.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  K. Southern Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: the practical implications. , 2004, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[3]  Xavier Estivill,et al.  Variation in a repeat sequence determines whether a common variant of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene is pathogenic or benign. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  P. Farrell Is newborn screening for cystic fibrosis a basic human right? , 2008, Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society.

[5]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[6]  C. Castellani,et al.  Cystic fibrosis carriers have higher neonatal immunoreactive trypsinogen values than non‐carriers , 2005, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[7]  K. Webb,et al.  Delayed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis associated with R117H on a background of 7T polythymidine tract at intron 8. , 2006, Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society.

[8]  R. Parad,et al.  Sweat testing infants detected by cystic fibrosis newborn screening. , 2005, The Journal of pediatrics.

[9]  JeanetteR. Crossle,et al.  DRIED-BLOOD SPOT SCREENING FOR CYSTIC FIBROSIS IN THE NEWBORN , 1979, The Lancet.

[10]  C. Férec,et al.  Neonatal screening of cystic fibrosis: diagnostic problems with CFTR mild mutations , 2007, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[11]  P. V. van Asperen,et al.  Pancreatic function and extended mutation analysis in DeltaF508 heterozygous infants with an elevated immunoreactive trypsinogen but normal sweat electrolyte levels. , 2000, The Journal of pediatrics.

[12]  J. Yankaskas,et al.  Diagnostic sweat testing: the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation guidelines. , 2007, The Journal of pediatrics.

[13]  C. Castellani,et al.  A survey of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Europe. , 2007, Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society.

[14]  C. Dezateux,et al.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (Cochrane Review) , 2001 .

[15]  M. Goossens,et al.  Polyvariant mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator genes. The polymorphic (Tg)m locus explains the partial penetrance of the T5 polymorphism as a disease mutation. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  M. Laughon,et al.  Sweat‐testing in preterm and full‐term infants less than 6 weeks of age , 2005, Pediatric pulmonology.

[17]  B. Kerem,et al.  Consensus on the Use and Interpretation of Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Analysis in Clinical Practice , 2022 .