Reconsidering substitution in long-term care: when does assistive technology take the place of personal care?

OBJECTIVE Assistive technology (AT) may improve quality of life and reduce dependence for older persons with disabilities. In this article, we examine tradeoffs between the use of AT and reliance on personal care, with attention to factors that may influence those relationships. METHODS We jointly modeled hours of formal and informal care with use of AT in order to address the interdependence of these outcomes in ways not taken into account in previous studies. We analyzed a national sample of older persons with difficulty in activities of daily living drawn from Phase 2 of the 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Disability Supplement. RESULTS Our findings show that the use of AT was associated with reductions in informal care hours, especially for those who were unmarried, better educated, or had better cognitive abilities, but appeared to supplement formal care services for these groups. Individuals with cognitive impairment were less likely than others to substitute AT with either type of personal care. DISCUSSION These models raise the possibility that reductions of informal care hours may be accomplished with a combination of formal care and assistive devices, rather than from either alternative alone.

[1]  T. Stanton Fraud-and-abuse enforcement in Medicare: finding middle ground. , 2001, Health affairs.

[2]  V. Freedman,et al.  A comparison of assistive technology and personal care in alleviating disability and unmet need. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[3]  P. Kemper,et al.  Community care demonstrations: What have we learned? , 1987, Health care financing review.

[4]  A J Moss,et al.  Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: prevalence, payment, need, and trends. , 1992, Advance data.

[5]  W. Christian,et al.  THE ROLE OF EDUCATION , 1998 .

[6]  V. Freedman,et al.  Incorporating Assistive Devices into Community-Based Long-Term Care , 2000, Journal of aging and health.

[7]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  Does assistive technology substitute for personal assistance among the disabled elderly? , 2003, American journal of public health.

[8]  A. Fine Recent trends. , 2003, Managed care quarterly.

[9]  E. Agree,et al.  The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[10]  G Grimby,et al.  Assistive devices in an elderly population studied at 70 and 76 years of age. , 1994, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  N. Chappell,et al.  Mobility Restriction and the Use of Devices among Seniors , 1994 .

[12]  V. Freedman,et al.  Aggregate changes in severe cognitive impairment among older Americans: 1993 and 1998. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[13]  Purvi Sevak,et al.  Use, type, and efficacy of assistance for disability. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[14]  L. Verbrugge,et al.  The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[15]  Jan Ondrich,et al.  Do Community-Based, Long-Term-Care Services Reduce Nursing Home Use? A Transition Probability Analysis , 1993 .

[16]  G. Koch,et al.  Self-care and assistance from others in coping with functional status limitations among a national sample of older adults. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[17]  K. Berg,et al.  Receiving help at home: the interplay of human and technological assistance. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[18]  C. Granger,et al.  Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly. A randomized controlled trial. , 1999, Archives of family medicine.

[19]  M. de Klerk,et al.  [Effects of technical aids on the utilization of professional care. A study among single 75-year olds]. , 1996, Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie.

[20]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  The Effect of Equipment Usage and Residual Task Difficulty on Use of Personal Assistance, Days in Bed, and Nursing Home Placement , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[21]  J. Krout Correlates of Senior Center Utilization , 1983 .

[22]  S. Allen Gender differences in spousal caregiving and unmet need for care. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[23]  V. Greene,et al.  Substitution Between Formally and Informally Provided Care for the Impaired Elderly in the Community , 1983, Medical care.

[24]  H. Burge,et al.  The Role of Education , 1993 .

[25]  K. Manton,et al.  Changes in the use of personal assistance and special equipment from 1982 to 1989: results from the 1982 and 1989 NLTCS. , 1993, The Gerontologist.

[26]  D. Wolf Population change: friend or foe of the chronic care system? , 2001, Health affairs.

[27]  Robert F Schoeni,et al.  Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[28]  S. Crawford,et al.  Is family care on the decline? A longitudinal investigation of the substitution of formal long-term care services for informal care. , 1993, The Milbank quarterly.

[29]  S. Ettner The Effect of the Medicaid Home Care Benefit on Long-Term Care Choices of the Elderly , 1994 .

[30]  J. Clarke Community care. , 2001, British Dental Journal.