Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update.

PURPOSE.— To update key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer guideline. METHODS.— Based on the signals approach, an Expert Panel reviewed published literature and research survey results on the observed frequency of less common in situ hybridization (ISH) patterns to update the recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS.— Two recommendations addressed via correspondence in 2015 are included. First, immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ is defined as invasive breast cancer with weak to moderate complete membrane staining observed in >10% of tumor cells. Second, if the initial HER2 test result in a core needle biopsy specimen of a primary breast cancer is negative, a new HER2 test may (not "must") be ordered on the excision specimen based on specific clinical criteria. The HER2 testing algorithm for breast cancer is updated to address the recommended workup for less common clinical scenarios (approximately 5% of cases) observed when using a dual-probe ISH assay. These scenarios are described as ISH group 2 ( HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 [CEP17] ratio ≥2.0; average HER2 copy number <4.0 signals per cell), ISH group 3 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥6.0 signals per cell), and ISH group 4 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 and <6.0 signals per cell). The diagnostic approach includes more rigorous interpretation criteria for ISH and requires concomitant IHC review for dual-probe ISH groups 2 to 4 to arrive at the most accurate HER2 status designation (positive or negative) based on combined interpretation of the ISH and IHC assays. The Expert Panel recommends that laboratories using single-probe ISH assays include concomitant IHC review as part of the interpretation of all single-probe ISH assay results.

[1]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[2]  E. Winer,et al.  Systemic Therapy for Patients With Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  M. Ellis,et al.  Neratinib Efficacy and Circulating Tumor DNA Detection of HER2 Mutations in HER2 Nonamplified Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  C. Quinn,et al.  New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers , 2016, Virchows Archiv.

[5]  I. Ellis,et al.  National guidelines and level of evidence: comments on some of the new recommendations in the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 guidelines for breast cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M. Troxell,et al.  The New Equivocal: Changes to HER2 FISH Results When Applying the 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines. , 2015, American journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  F. Lu,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer According to 2007 and 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  T. Lim Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer , 2016 .

[9]  S. Jaffer,et al.  The Impact of 2013 Updated ASCO/CAP HER2 Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Invasive Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Study of 1739 Cases. , 2017, Clinical breast cancer.

[10]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  E. Winer,et al.  Systemic therapy for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  M. Okano,et al.  Cohort Study , 2020, Definitions.

[13]  S. Groshen,et al.  Assessing the New American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guidelines for HER2 Testing by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization: Experience of an Academic Consultation Practice. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC). , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  Fabrice Andre,et al.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update-Integration of Results From TAILORx. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  R. West,et al.  Evaluation of Her-2/neu status in carcinomas with amplified chromosome 17 centromere locus. , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  C. Gilks,et al.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in primary breast cancer in the era of standardized testing: a Canadian prospective study. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Vandana G Abramson,et al.  Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of Cancer Care Ontario Guideline Recommendations. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  A. Luini,et al.  The clinical relevance of micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a case–control study , 2013, Histopathology.

[20]  C. Sung,et al.  Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective s , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  Mitch Dowsett,et al.  HER2 in situ hybridization in breast cancer: clinical implications of polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity , 2014, Modern Pathology.

[22]  E. Winer,et al.  Recommendations on disease management for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  S. Bianchi,et al.  Accuracy and Reproducibility of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Immunohistochemistry: A Quality Control Study in Tuscany Evaluating the Impact of Updated 2013 ASCO/CAP Recommendations , 2015, Pathology & Oncology Research.

[24]  K. Shojania,et al.  How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  S. Gunn,et al.  Clinical validation of an array CGH test for HER2 status in breast cancer reveals that polysomy 17 is a rare event , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[26]  I. Reis,et al.  HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[27]  T. Henkel,et al.  Impact of updated HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer—re-evaluation of HERA trial fluorescence in situ hybridization data , 2015, Modern Pathology.

[28]  L. Pusztai,et al.  Reply to E.A. Rakha et al , 2012 .

[29]  L. Tafe,et al.  Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates at an Academic Medical Center That Performs Primary HER2 FISH Testing: Increase in Equivocal Results and Utility of Reflex Immunohistochemistry. , 2015, American journal of clinical pathology.

[30]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Determining true HER2 gene status in breast cancers with polysomy by using alternative chromosome 17 reference genes: implications for anti-HER2 targeted therapy. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  M. Somerfield,et al.  Selection of Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) -Negative and Adjuvant Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancers: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Adaptation of the Cancer Care Ontario Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  M. Bennett,et al.  Reflex Repeat HER2 Testing of Grade 3 Breast Carcinoma at Excision Using Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Analysis: Frequency of HER2 Discordance and Utility of Core Needle Biopsy Parameters to Refine Case Selection. , 2016, American journal of clinical pathology.

[33]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer , 2014, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[34]  R. Bast,et al.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Systemic Therapy for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  N. Sneige,et al.  Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[36]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[37]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Does chromosome 17 centromere copy number predict polysomy in breast cancer? A fluorescence in situ hybridization and microarray‐based CGH analysis , 2009, The Journal of pathology.

[38]  K. Hess,et al.  Prognostic significance of equivocal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results and clinical utility of alternative chromosome 17 genes in patients with invasive breast cancer: A cohort study , 2017, Cancer.

[39]  P. Tan,et al.  Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[40]  M. Buyse,et al.  HER2 Gene Amplification Testing by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH): Comparison of the ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guidelines With FISH Scores Used for Enrollment in Breast Cancer International Research Group Clinical Trials , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  R. West,et al.  ‘Non-classical’ HER2 FISH results in breast cancer: a multi-institutional study , 2017, Modern Pathology.

[42]  P. Diest,et al.  Absence of chromosome 17 polysomy in breast cancer: analysis by CEP17 chromogenic in situ hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[43]  Z. Gatalica,et al.  Assessment of HER2 gene status in breast carcinomas with polysomy of chromosome 17 , 2011, Cancer.

[44]  Ian Krop,et al.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  A. Noske,et al.  Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience , 2015, PloS one.

[46]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[47]  M. Dell'aquila,et al.  Her2/neu Status Determination in Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience Using a Dual-Testing Approach With Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization , 2017, American journal of clinical pathology.