Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update.
暂无分享,去创建一个
John M S Bartlett | Patrick Fitzgibbons | Lisa M McShane | Ian O Ellis | I. Ellis | M. Dowsett | M. Hammond | L. McShane | A. Wolff | K. Allison | G. Viale | J. Bartlett | M. Press | G. Vance | R. Jenkins | P. Fitzgibbons | P. Mangu | W. Hanna | M. Bilous | P. Spears | Giuseppe Viale | Robert B Jenkins | Mitchell Dowsett | Antonio C Wolff | Michael F Press | Wedad Hanna | Kimberly H Allison | Gail H Vance | Pamela B Mangu | M Elizabeth Hale Hammond | Brittany E Harvey | Michael Bilous | Patricia A Spears
[1] John M S Bartlett,et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[2] E. Winer,et al. Systemic Therapy for Patients With Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[3] M. Ellis,et al. Neratinib Efficacy and Circulating Tumor DNA Detection of HER2 Mutations in HER2 Nonamplified Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.
[4] C. Quinn,et al. New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers , 2016, Virchows Archiv.
[5] I. Ellis,et al. National guidelines and level of evidence: comments on some of the new recommendations in the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 guidelines for breast cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[6] M. Troxell,et al. The New Equivocal: Changes to HER2 FISH Results When Applying the 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines. , 2015, American journal of clinical pathology.
[7] F. Lu,et al. Comparative Analysis of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer According to 2007 and 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[8] T. Lim. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer , 2016 .
[9] S. Jaffer,et al. The Impact of 2013 Updated ASCO/CAP HER2 Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Invasive Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Study of 1739 Cases. , 2017, Clinical breast cancer.
[10] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[11] E. Winer,et al. Systemic therapy for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[12] M. Okano,et al. Cohort Study , 2020, Definitions.
[13] S. Groshen,et al. Assessing the New American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guidelines for HER2 Testing by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization: Experience of an Academic Consultation Practice. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[14] M. Dowsett,et al. Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC). , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[15] Fabrice Andre,et al. Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update-Integration of Results From TAILORx. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[16] R. West,et al. Evaluation of Her-2/neu status in carcinomas with amplified chromosome 17 centromere locus. , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.
[17] C. Gilks,et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in primary breast cancer in the era of standardized testing: a Canadian prospective study. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[18] Vandana G Abramson,et al. Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of Cancer Care Ontario Guideline Recommendations. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[19] A. Luini,et al. The clinical relevance of micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a case–control study , 2013, Histopathology.
[20] C. Sung,et al. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective s , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[21] Mitch Dowsett,et al. HER2 in situ hybridization in breast cancer: clinical implications of polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity , 2014, Modern Pathology.
[22] E. Winer,et al. Recommendations on disease management for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[23] S. Bianchi,et al. Accuracy and Reproducibility of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Immunohistochemistry: A Quality Control Study in Tuscany Evaluating the Impact of Updated 2013 ASCO/CAP Recommendations , 2015, Pathology & Oncology Research.
[24] K. Shojania,et al. How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[25] S. Gunn,et al. Clinical validation of an array CGH test for HER2 status in breast cancer reveals that polysomy 17 is a rare event , 2009, Modern Pathology.
[26] I. Reis,et al. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[27] T. Henkel,et al. Impact of updated HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer—re-evaluation of HERA trial fluorescence in situ hybridization data , 2015, Modern Pathology.
[28] L. Pusztai,et al. Reply to E.A. Rakha et al , 2012 .
[29] L. Tafe,et al. Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates at an Academic Medical Center That Performs Primary HER2 FISH Testing: Increase in Equivocal Results and Utility of Reflex Immunohistochemistry. , 2015, American journal of clinical pathology.
[30] L. Goldstein,et al. Determining true HER2 gene status in breast cancers with polysomy by using alternative chromosome 17 reference genes: implications for anti-HER2 targeted therapy. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[31] M. Somerfield,et al. Selection of Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) -Negative and Adjuvant Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancers: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Adaptation of the Cancer Care Ontario Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[32] M. Bennett,et al. Reflex Repeat HER2 Testing of Grade 3 Breast Carcinoma at Excision Using Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Analysis: Frequency of HER2 Discordance and Utility of Core Needle Biopsy Parameters to Refine Case Selection. , 2016, American journal of clinical pathology.
[33] John M S Bartlett,et al. Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer , 2014, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[34] R. Bast,et al. Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Systemic Therapy for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[35] N. Sneige,et al. Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[36] Anthony Rhodes,et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[37] A. Ashworth,et al. Does chromosome 17 centromere copy number predict polysomy in breast cancer? A fluorescence in situ hybridization and microarray‐based CGH analysis , 2009, The Journal of pathology.
[38] K. Hess,et al. Prognostic significance of equivocal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results and clinical utility of alternative chromosome 17 genes in patients with invasive breast cancer: A cohort study , 2017, Cancer.
[39] P. Tan,et al. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[40] M. Buyse,et al. HER2 Gene Amplification Testing by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH): Comparison of the ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guidelines With FISH Scores Used for Enrollment in Breast Cancer International Research Group Clinical Trials , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[41] R. West,et al. ‘Non-classical’ HER2 FISH results in breast cancer: a multi-institutional study , 2017, Modern Pathology.
[42] P. Diest,et al. Absence of chromosome 17 polysomy in breast cancer: analysis by CEP17 chromogenic in situ hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[43] Z. Gatalica,et al. Assessment of HER2 gene status in breast carcinomas with polysomy of chromosome 17 , 2011, Cancer.
[44] Ian Krop,et al. Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[45] A. Noske,et al. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience , 2015, PloS one.
[46] Anthony Rhodes,et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[47] M. Dell'aquila,et al. Her2/neu Status Determination in Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience Using a Dual-Testing Approach With Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization , 2017, American journal of clinical pathology.