Optimization of WAG Process Using Dynamic Proxy, Genetic Algorithm and Ant Colony Optimization

The optimization of water alternating gas injection (WAG) process is a complex problem, which requires a significant number of numerical simulations that are time-consuming. Therefore, developing a fast and accurate replacing method becomes a necessity. Proxy models that are light mathematical models have a high ability to identify very complex and non-straightforward problems such as the answers of numerical simulators in brief deadlines. Different static proxy models have been used to date, where a predefined model is employed to approximate the outputs of numerical simulators such as field oil production total (FOPT) or net present value, at a given time and not as functions of time. This study demonstrates the application of time-dependent multi Artificial Neural Networks as a dynamic proxy to the optimization of a WAG process in a synthetic field. Latin hypercube design is used to select the database employed in the training phase. By coupling the established proxy with genetic algorithm (GA) and ant colony optimization (ACO), the optimum WAG parameters, namely gas and water injection rates, gas and water injection half-cycle, WAG ratio and slug size, which maximize FOPT subject to some time-depending constraints, are investigated. The problem is formulated as a nonlinear optimization problem with bound and nonlinear constraints. The results show that the established proxy is found to be robust and an efficient alternative for mimicking the numerical simulator performances in the optimization of the WAG. Both GA and ACO are strongly shown to be highly effective in the combinatorial optimization of the WAG process.

[1]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  A literature survey of benchmark functions for global optimisation problems , 2013, Int. J. Math. Model. Numer. Optimisation.

[2]  John Geraghty,et al.  Genetic Algorithm Performance with Different Selection Strategies in Solving TSP , 2011 .

[3]  Andrei Popa,et al.  Associative Data Modeling and Ant Colony Optimizaton Approach for Waterflood Analysis , 2012 .

[4]  U. Kirsch,et al.  Efficient reanalysis for topological optimization , 1993 .

[5]  L. Durlofsky,et al.  Application of a particle swarm optimization algorithm for determining optimum well location and type , 2010 .

[6]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Ant colony system: a cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[7]  Hamed Panjalizadeh,et al.  A workflow for risk analysis and optimization of steam flooding scenario using static and dynamic proxy models , 2014 .

[8]  Shahab D. Mohaghegh,et al.  Artificial Intelligence (AI) Assisted History Matching , 2014 .

[9]  A. Malallah,et al.  Parametric Investigations of a Modified SWAG Injection Technique , 2007 .

[10]  Patrick Siarry,et al.  Applications of Metaheuristics in Process Engineering , 2014, Springer International Publishing.

[11]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[12]  K. Deb An Efficient Constraint Handling Method for Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[13]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms, Homomorphous Mappings, and Constrained Parameter Optimization , 1999, Evolutionary Computation.

[14]  Mohammad Sayyafzadeh,et al.  A Self-Adaptive Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm for Well Placement Optimization Problems , 2015 .

[15]  Shahab D. Mohaghegh,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining: Enabling Technology for Smart Fields , 2009 .

[16]  Yahya Al-Wahaibi,et al.  Numerical Simulation and Experimental Studies of Oil Recovery via First-Contact Miscible Water Alternating Gas Injection within Shaley Porous Media , 2007 .

[17]  Elisabeth Iren Dale,et al.  Progress in Immiscible WAG Modelling , 2007 .

[18]  Erling Halfdan Stenby,et al.  Review of WAG Field Experience , 2001 .

[19]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[20]  Susana Gómez,et al.  Application of an Evolutionary Algorithm in Well Test Characterization of Naturally Fractured Vuggy Reservoirs , 2006 .

[21]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[22]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  Differential Evolution for Assisted History Matching Process: SAGD Case Study , 2013 .

[23]  Shahab D. Mohaghegh,et al.  Reservoir Simulation and Modeling Based on Pattern Recognition , 2011 .

[24]  Mohammad Sayyafzadeh History Matching by Online Metamodeling , 2015 .

[25]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[26]  Yasin Hajizadeh,et al.  Ant colony optimization for history matching and uncertainty quantification of reservoir models , 2011 .

[27]  Ridha Gharbi,et al.  An introduction to artificial intelligence applications in petroleum exploration and production , 2005 .

[28]  Shahab D. Mohaghegh,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainties Associated With Reservoir Simulation Studies Using a Surrogate Reservoir Model , 2006 .