Design Efficiency for Non-Market Valuation with Choice Modelling: How to Measure it, What to Report and Why
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] John R. Hauser,et al. Research Note---On Managerially Efficient Experimental Designs , 2007 .
[2] Riccardo Scarpa,et al. Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study , 2007 .
[3] R. Scarpa,et al. Benefit Estimates for Landscape Improvements: Sequential Bayesian Design and Respondents’ Rationality in a Choice Experiment , 2005, Land Economics.
[4] John M. Rose,et al. Designing Stated Choice Experiments: State of the Art , 2007 .
[5] K. Train,et al. Utility in WTP Space: A Tool to Address Confounding Random Scale Effects in Destination Choice to the Alps , 2006 .
[6] D. Hensher. How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load , 2006 .
[7] Peter Goos,et al. A Comparison of Criteria to Design Efficient Choice Experiments , 2006 .
[8] David A. Hensher,et al. Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial Assessment , 2006 .
[9] Peter Goos,et al. A Comparison of Criteria to Design Efficient , 2006 .
[10] John R. Hauser,et al. On Managerially Efficient Experimental Designs , 2006 .
[11] Jordan J. Louviere,et al. Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments , 2005 .
[12] Deborah J. Street,et al. Optimal designs for choice experiments with asymmetric attributes , 2005 .
[13] John M. Rose,et al. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .
[14] D. Hensher,et al. Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates , 2005 .
[15] F. Norwood,et al. Effect of Experimental Design on Choice‐Based Conjoint Valuation Estimates , 2005 .
[16] Michel Wedel,et al. Heterogeneous Conjoint Choice Designs , 2005 .
[17] John M. Rose,et al. Efficiency and sample size requirements for stated choice studies , 2005 .
[18] Riccardo Scarpa,et al. Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments , 2005 .
[19] Kenneth Train,et al. Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to Pay Space , 2005 .
[20] John M. Rose,et al. Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .
[21] John M. Rose,et al. Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .
[22] David A. Hensher,et al. IDENTIFYING THE INFLUENCE OF STATED CHOICE DESIGN DIMENSIONALITY ON WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS , 2004 .
[23] Jordan J. Louviere,et al. A 20+ Years’ Retrospective on Choice Experiments , 2004 .
[24] Peter Goos,et al. Comparing algorithms and criteria for designing Bayesian conjoint choice experiments , 2004 .
[25] D. Street,et al. Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-level choice experiments , 2004 .
[26] Ta Theo Arentze,et al. Transport stated choice responses: effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy , 2003 .
[27] Kenneth E. Train,et al. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .
[28] Wiebke Kuklys,et al. Stated choice methods: analysis and application, Jordan J. Louviere, David A. Hensher and Joffre D. Swait, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0-521-78830-7 , 2002 .
[29] Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al. Range and Number-of-Levels Effects in Derived and Stated Measures of Attribute Importance , 2002 .
[30] Michel Wedel,et al. Profile Construction in Experimental Choice Designs for Mixed Logit Models , 2002 .
[31] J. R. DeShazo,et al. Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency , 2002 .
[32] Barbara Kanninen,et al. Optimal Design for Multinomial Choice Experiments , 2002 .
[33] William S. Breffle,et al. Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs , 2002, Land Economics.
[34] M. Wedel,et al. Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers' Prior Beliefs , 2001 .
[35] Jordan J. Louviere,et al. An exploratory analysis of the effect of numbers of choice sets in designed choice experiments: an airline choice application , 2001 .
[36] David S. Bunch,et al. OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR 2 k PAIRED COMPARISON EXPERIMENTS , 2001 .
[37] Jordan J. Louviere,et al. Attribute Range Effects in Binary Response Tasks , 2000 .
[38] William L. Moore,et al. A Comparison of Conjoint Methods When There Are Many Attributes , 1999 .
[39] Joel Huber,et al. The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs , 1996 .
[40] Alan D. J. Cooke,et al. Attribute Range and Response Range: Limits of Compatibility in Multiattribute Judgment , 1995 .
[41] Anna Alberini,et al. Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-Bound, Double-Bound, and Bivariate Models , 1995 .
[42] J. Louviere,et al. The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models , 1993 .
[43] Barbara Kanninen,et al. Design of Sequential Experiments for Contingent Valuation Studies , 1993 .
[44] Barbara Kanninen,et al. Optimal Experimental Design for Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1993 .
[45] R. D. Cook,et al. A Comparison of Algorithms for Constructing Exact D-Optimal Designs , 1980 .
[46] R. Emori. CASE STUDY 9 , 1977 .
[47] P. Zarembka. Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .
[48] D. McFadden. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .