Dynamics of a model for brain tumors reveals a small window for therapeutic intervention

Glioblastomas are the most malignant and most common glioma, a type of primary brain tumor with the unfortunate ability to recur despite extensive treatment. Even with the advent of medical imaging technology during the last two decades, successful treatment of glioblastomas has remained elusive. It has become increasingly clear that, along with the proliferative potential of these neoplasms, it is the subclinically diffuse invasion of glioblastomas that primarily contributes to their resistance to treatment. In other words, the inevitable recurrence of these tumors is the result of diffusely invaded but invisible tumor cells peripheral to the abnormal signal on medical imaging and to the current limits of surgical, radiological and chemical treatments. Mathematical modeling has presented itself as a viable tool for studying complex biological processes (Murray, 1993, 2002). We have developed a mathematical model that portrays the growth and extension of theoretical glioblastoma cells in a matrix that accurately describes the brain's anatomy to a resolution of 1 cu mm (Swanson, et al, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003a, 2003b). The model assumes that only two factors need be considered for such predictions: net growth rate and infiltrative ability. The model has already provided illustrations of theoretical glioblastomas that not only closely resemble the MRIs (magnetic resonance imaging) of actual patients, but also show the distribution of the diffusely infiltrating cells.

[1]  J. Murray,et al.  A mathematical model of glioma growth: the effect of extent of surgical resection , 1996, Cell proliferation.

[2]  J. Nazzaro,et al.  The role of surgery in the management of supratentorial intermediate and high-grade astrocytomas in adults. , 1990, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  Anne Greenbaum,et al.  Iterative methods for solving linear systems , 1997, Frontiers in applied mathematics.

[4]  Locoregional approaches to therapy with gliomas as the paradigm. , 1998, Current opinion in oncology.

[5]  Robert C. Rostomily,et al.  The cause of death in patients with glioblastoma is multifactorial: , 1991, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[6]  D. Silbergeld,et al.  Assessment of brain tumor cell motility in vivo and in vitro. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  Paul Thompson,et al.  Mapping tumor growth rates in patients with malignant gliomas: A test of two algorithms , 2000, NeuroImage.

[9]  J. Murray,et al.  A mathematical model of glioma growth: the effect of chemotherapy on spatio‐temporal growth , 1995, Cell proliferation.

[10]  B. Fisher,et al.  Supratentorial malignant glioma: patterns of recurrence and implications for external beam local treatment. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  M. Westphal,et al.  Glioma invasion in the central nervous system. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[12]  B A Kall,et al.  Imaging-based stereotaxic serial biopsies in untreated intracranial glial neoplasms. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  J. Strikwerda Finite Difference Schemes and Partial Differential Equations , 1989 .

[14]  J. Murray,et al.  A quantitative model for differential motility of gliomas in grey and white matter , 2000, Cell proliferation.

[15]  P. Kleihues,et al.  Topographic anatomy and CT correlations in the untreated glioblastoma multiforme. , 1988, Journal of neurosurgery.