Does Day 3 embryo status matter to reproductive outcomes of single blastocyst transfer cycles? A cohort study.

OBJECTIVE To investigate whether Day 3 (D3) embryo status matter to reproductive outcomes of blastocyst transfer cycles. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Assisted Reproduction Department of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. POPULATION A total of 6906 vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles in 6502 women were included. METHODS Generalised estimated equation regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between embryo status and pregnancy outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth. RESULTS High-quality blastocysts derived from poor-grade D3 embryos had comparable pregnancy outcomes to those derived from high-grade D3 embryos (40.0% versus 43.2%, aOR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.17 for live birth rate; 8.3% versus 9.5%, aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.07 for miscarriage rate). Cycles with low D3 cell number (five cells or fewer) had significantly higher miscarriage rate (9.2% versus 7.6%, aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.02-1.75) compared with cycles with eight cells on D3. CONCLUSIONS Poor-quality cleavage embryos should be cultivated to the blastocyst stage because high-quality blastocysts derived from poor-grade D3 embryos had acceptable pregnancy outcomes. When the blastocyst grade is identical, choosing embryos with higher D3 cell number (eight or more cells) for transfer could reduce the risk of early miscarriage.

[1]  Z. Diao,et al.  The influence of day 3 embryo cell number on the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of day 5 single blastocyst transfer from frozen embryo transfer cycles , 2022, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[2]  B. Mol,et al.  Should we look for a low-grade threshold for blastocyst transfer? A scoping review. , 2021, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[3]  Qiuju Chen,et al.  The effect of Day 3 cell number on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles. , 2020, Human reproduction.

[4]  Di Chen,et al.  The Valuable Reference of Live Birth Rate in the Single Vitrified-Warmed BB/BC/CB Blastocyst Transfer: The Cleavage-Stage Embryo Quality and Embryo Development Speed , 2020, Frontiers in Physiology.

[5]  S. Choe,et al.  Correlation between Morphologic Grading and Euploidy Rates of Blastocysts, and Clinical Outcomes in In Vitro Fertilization Preimplantation Genetic Screening , 2019, Journal of Korean medical science.

[6]  Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinically assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. , 2018, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  N. Desai,et al.  Are cleavage anomalies, multinucleation, or specific cell cycle kinetics observed with time-lapse imaging predictive of embryo developmental capacity or ploidy? , 2018, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  B. Mol,et al.  Comparison of ectopic pregnancy risk among transfers of embryos vitrified on day 3, day 5, and day 6. , 2017, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  Nikica Zaninovic,et al.  Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. , 2017, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  M. Grynberg,et al.  Should we consider day-2 and day-3 embryo morphology before day-5 transfer when blastocysts reach a similar good quality? , 2016, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[11]  C. Farquhar,et al.  Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms? , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  Z. Shoham,et al.  Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  H. Huhtala,et al.  Can repeated IVF-ICSI-cycles be avoided by using blastocysts developing from poor-quality cleavage stage embryos? , 2015, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[14]  N. Frydman,et al.  Is it acceptable to destroy or include human embryos before day 5 in research programmes? , 2014, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[15]  J. Grifo,et al.  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in elective single blastocyst transfer versus double blastocyst transfer stratified by age. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  F. Sharara,et al.  Incidence of monozygotic twins in blastocyst and cleavage stage assisted reproductive technology cycles. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[17]  A. Campana,et al.  The rate of development and time of transfer play different roles in influencing the viability of human blastocysts. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[18]  C. Farquhar,et al.  Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.