The Impact of Outliers on Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha Estimate of Reliability: Ordinal/Rating Scale Item Responses

In a recent Monte Carlo simulation study, Liu and Zumbo showed that outliers can severely inflate the estimates of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha for continuous item response data—visual analogue response format. Little, however, is known about the effect of outliers for ordinal item response data—also commonly referred to as Likert, Likert-type, ordered categorical, or ordinal/rating scale item responses. Building on the work of Liu and Zumbo, the authors investigated the effects of outlier contamination for binary and ordinal response scales. Their results showed that coefficient alpha estimates were severely inflated with the presence of outliers, and like the earlier findings, the effects of outliers were reduced with increasing theoretical reliability. The efficiency of coefficient alpha estimates (i.e., sample-to-sample variation) was inflated as well and affected by the number of scale points. It is worth noting that when there were no outliers, the alpha estimates were downward biased because of the ordinal scaling. However, the alpha estimates were, in general, inflated in the presence of outliers leading to positive bias.

[1]  Daniel Bernoulli,et al.  The most probable choice between several discrepant observations and the formation therefrom of the most likely induction , 1961 .

[2]  C. Enders,et al.  The Effects of Nonnormality and Number of Response Categories on Reliability , 1996 .

[3]  Lewis R. Aiken,et al.  Number of Response Categories and Statistics on a Teacher Rating Scale , 1983 .

[4]  Chi-Sum Wong,et al.  Differences between odd and even number of response scale: Some empirical evidence. , 1993 .

[5]  Wobbe P. Zijlstra,et al.  Outlier Detection in Test and Questionnaire Data , 2007 .

[6]  Rand R. Wilcox,et al.  Robust generalizations of classical test reliability and Cronbach's alpha , 1992 .

[7]  S. Weisberg,et al.  Characterizations of an Empirical Influence Function for Detecting Influential Cases in Regression , 1980 .

[8]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[9]  J. Guilford Psychometric methods, 2nd ed. , 1954 .

[10]  Bruno D. Zumbo,et al.  The robustness of validity and efficiency of the related samples t-test in the presence of outliers , 2002 .

[11]  Stanley L. Sclove Mathematical Statistics (3rd ed.) , 1981 .

[12]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity , 1971 .

[13]  S. Stouffer,et al.  Measurement and Prediction , 1954 .

[14]  John C. Lind,et al.  The Continuity Principle in Psychological Research: An Introduction to Robust Statistics , 1993 .

[15]  J. Stevens,et al.  Outliers and influential data points in regression analysis. , 1984 .

[16]  G. Jenkins,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of factors affecting three indices of composite scale reliability. , 1977 .

[17]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  The Power of t and Wilcoxon Statistics , 1980 .

[18]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[19]  Julia Kastner,et al.  Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing , 2005 .

[20]  David Kaplan,et al.  The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences , 2004 .

[21]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Outliers in Statistical Data , 1979 .

[22]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[23]  Rand R. Wilcox,et al.  How many discoveries have been lost by ignoring modern statistical methods , 1998 .

[24]  Bruno D. Zumbo,et al.  Ordinal Versions of Coefficients Alpha and Theta for Likert Rating Scales , 2007 .

[25]  R. Lissitz,et al.  Effect of the number of scale points on reliability: A Monte Carlo approach. , 1975 .

[26]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[27]  J. Barnette Nonattending Respondent Effects on Internal Consistency of Self-Administered Surveys: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study , 1999 .

[28]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[29]  Bruno D. Zumbo,et al.  Is the selection of statistical methods governed by level of measurement , 1993 .

[30]  J. Osborne Notes on the use of data transformations. , 2002 .

[31]  Peter J. Huber,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[32]  Yan Liu,et al.  The Impact of Outliers on Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha Estimate of Reliability: Visual Analogue Scales , 2007 .

[33]  E. Ziegel Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing (2nd ed.) , 2005 .

[34]  L. Weng Impact of the Number of Response Categories and Anchor Labels on Coefficient Alpha and Test-Retest Reliability , 2004 .

[35]  E. Krieg Biases Induced by Coarse Measurement Scales , 1999 .

[36]  Bruno D. Zumbo,et al.  The relative power of parametric and nonparametric statistical methods. , 1993 .

[37]  A. Rupp,et al.  Responsible Modeling of Measurement Data for Appropriate Inferences: Important Advances in Reliability and Validity Theory , 2004 .