Simulations and games

Based on a categorization of simulation and gaming barriers developed in a previous study, this work seeks to explore in greater depth the composition and nature of these obstacles. It examines the interrelationships between the barriers and the impact of other contextual factors in the pedagogic environment. A series of in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 staff involved in teaching with simulations and games within a UK higher education institution. The findings underline the significant linkages apparent between three broad barriers to teaching with simulations, games and role-play: suitability, resource and risk. Further analysis of the interview transcripts facilitated the identification of a range of mechanisms which may be employed to overcome the aforementioned barriers: freeing up academics’ time, providing training and development, enabling informal learning, providing resource support, facilitating access to networks and providing access to secondary information sources. These mechanisms are discussed and evaluated in relation to the broader educational context.

[1]  David L. Corsun,et al.  Charting the Experiential Territory: Clarifying Definitions and Uses of Computer Simulation, Games, and Role Play , 2002 .

[2]  Robin Lightner,et al.  Games as an Interactive Classroom Technique: Perceptions of Corporate Trainers, College Instructors and Students , 2007 .

[3]  D. Kember.  A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[4]  Liam Kane.  Educators, learners and active learning methodologies , 2004 .

[5]  M. Shubik.  Gaming: Costs and Facilities , 1968 .

[6]  Heather Rolfe,et al.  University strategy in an age of uncertainty: the effect of higher education funding on old and new universities , 2003 .

[7]  Dave Alden,et al.  Experience with Scripted Role Play in Environmental Economics , 1999 .

[8]  Jörg Fischer,et al.  The benefits of using a market share model in a simulation aided planning game , 2003 .

[9]  Virginia King.  Roles and Identity in Scenario-Based Learning Online , 2006 .

[10]  C. H. J. Davies.  Student engagement with simulations: a case study , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[11]  C. Greenblat.  Teaching with Simulation Games: A Review of Claims and Evidence. , 1973 .

[12]  John V. Dempsey,et al.  Forty Simple Computer Games and What They Could Mean to Educators , 2002 .

[13]  S. Wildman,et al.  The value of simulations in the management education of nurses: students' perceptions. , 1997, Journal of nursing management.

[14]  John Rolfe,et al.  SAGSET 1990--The Proof of the Pudding: The Effectiveness of Games and Simulations. , 1991 .

[15]  Heather Rolfe,et al.  Students' Demands and Expectations in an Age of Reduced Financial Support: The perspectives of lecturers in four English universities , 2002 .

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[17]  Bernard Keys.  Improving Management Development Through Simulation Gaming , 1986 .

[18]  E. Hsu,et al.  Role-Event Gaming Simulation in Management Education , 1989 .

[19]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Strategic alertness and expanded awareness within sophisticated conceptions of teaching , 2000 .

[20]  R M Harden,et al.  Adoption and integration of simulation‐based learning technologies into the curriculum of a UK Undergraduate Education Programme , 2003, Medical education.

[21]  Jonathan D. Moizer,et al.  Simulations and games , 2009 .

[22]  Lucia Pannese,et al.  Games and learning come together to maximise effectiveness: The challenge of bridging the gap , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..