Multifactorial fuzzy approach to the sawability classification of building stones

Abstract The performances of circular sawing with diamond impregnated tools were evaluated in stone processing plants located in some areas of Turkey. Samples were collected from these factories for the laboratory tests. Uniaxial compressive strength, tensile strength, Schmidt hammer value, point load strength, impact strength, Los Angeles abrasion loss and P -wave velocity were determined in the laboratory. Performance measurements and stone properties were evaluated by using the multifactorial fuzzy approach which is a special case of multiple objective multifactorial decision making for the sawability classification of building stones. Using three different decision functions, the sawing performances of diamond saws were classified into three categories: excellent, good and poor. It is possible to evaluate the sawability and select a suitable diamond saw for a new building stone by only some stone properties testing using the developed fuzzy classification system.

[1]  E. Broch,et al.  ESTIMATION OF STRENGTH ANISOTROPY USING THE POINT LOAD TEST , 1983 .

[2]  E. T. Brown,et al.  Rock characterization testing and monitoring , 1981 .

[3]  R. Yager Fuzzy decision making including unequal objectives , 1978 .

[4]  M. Karakus,et al.  Fuzzy and Multiple Regression Modelling for Evaluation of Intact Rock Strength Based on Point Load, Schmidt Hammer and Sonic Velocity , 2006 .

[5]  O. Gunaydin,et al.  Predicting the sawability of carbonate rocks using multiple curvilinear regression analysis , 2004 .

[6]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Fuzzy sets and systems ' . Theory and applications , 2007 .

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[8]  J. Fodor,et al.  Evaluation of Uncertainties and Risks in Geology , 2004 .

[9]  Bahtiyar Ünver,et al.  A Statistical Method For Practical Assessment of Sawability of Rocks , 1996 .

[10]  R. Yager On a general class of fuzzy connectives , 1980 .

[11]  T. Ross Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[12]  S. H. Zhang,et al.  A New Method of Grading the Sawability of Natural Rock Materials , 2003 .

[13]  J. A. Franklin,et al.  Suggested method for determining point load strength , 1985 .

[14]  Uzay Kaymak,et al.  Fuzzy Decision Making in Modeling and Control , 2002, World Scientific Series in Robotics and Intelligent Systems.

[15]  Hongxing Li,et al.  Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Decision-Making , 1995 .

[16]  Chengyong Wang,et al.  Study on the fuzzy ranking of granite sawability , 2003 .

[17]  Z. T. Bieniawski,et al.  Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials: Part 1. Suggested method for determination of the uniaxial compressive strength of rock materials , 1979 .

[18]  L. M. Suárez Del Río,et al.  The influence of rock microhardness on the sawability of Pink Porrino granite (Spain) , 2005 .

[19]  Uzay Kaymak,et al.  Fuzzy decision making with control applications , 1998 .

[20]  Andrzej Piegat,et al.  Fuzzy Modeling and Control , 2001 .

[21]  E. T. Brown Rock characterization, testing & monitoring: ISRM suggested methods , 1981 .

[22]  Giovanni Muscato,et al.  Membership function shape and the dynamic behaviour of fuzzy systems , 1994 .

[23]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Weighted minimum and maximum operations in fuzzy set theory , 1986, Inf. Sci..