Optimum microphone array for monaural and binaural in-the-canal hearing aids

Modern hearing aids include signal processing algorithms to improve the speech intelligibility by means of a microphone array, which can be monaural or binaural. In both cases, the signals are distorted by the well-known head-shadow effect that must be considered in the design. The main goal of this paper is to find the best microphone array configuration for in-the-canal hearing aids, constrained by the reduced dimension of such devices, in order to maximize the output gain and intelligibility when the array is steered to the desired direction. For this purpose, a total of 12 different array arrangements are compared, in terms of the array gain and intelligibility obtained by a Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) beamformer, which also considers the head-shadow effect. The highest gain and intelligibility are obtained by a binaural array composed by a total of 8 microphones, 4 in diamond-shaped alignment in each ear. The results show the level of improvement achieved by increasing the number of microphones as well as using binaural arrays, giving rise to a compromise between the complexity of the array and the desired enhancement.

[1]  P M Zurek,et al.  Multimicrophone adaptive beamforming for interference reduction in hearing aids. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  Enrique Alexandre,et al.  Enhancing the energy efficiency of wireless-communicated binaural hearing aids for speech separation driven by soft-computing algorithms , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[3]  V. Ralph Algazi,et al.  An adaptable ellipsoidal head model for the interaural time difference , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[4]  Peter Vary,et al.  Dual-Channel Speech Enhancement by Superdirective Beamforming , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[5]  C. Avendano,et al.  The CIPIC HRTF database , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Workshop on the Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (Cat. No.01TH8575).

[6]  Boaz Rafaely,et al.  Microphone Array Signal Processing , 2008 .

[7]  L. J. Griffiths,et al.  An alternative approach to linearly constrained adaptive beamforming , 1982 .

[8]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  An efficient HRTF model for 3-D sound , 1997, Proceedings of 1997 Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics.

[9]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Robustness Analysis of Binaural Hearing Aid Beamformer Algorithms by Means of Objective Perceptual Quality Measures , 2007, 2007 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics.

[10]  M. Bouchard,et al.  Beamformer performance limits in monaural and binaural hearing aid applications , 2008, 2008 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[11]  Yi Hu,et al.  Evaluation of Objective Quality Measures for Speech Enhancement , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[12]  Sriram Srinivasan,et al.  Rate-Constrained Beamforming in Binaural Hearing Aids , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[13]  Jingdong Chen,et al.  Microphone Array Signal Processing , 2008 .

[14]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Signal Processing Advances in Robots and Autonomy , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..