Stable matching mechanisms are not obviously strategy-proof
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Avinatan Hassidim,et al. The Mechanism Is Truthful, Why Aren't You?† , 2017 .
[2] Seth Sanders,et al. The value of information in centralized school choice systems , 2017 .
[3] Shengwu Li. Obviously Strategy-Proof Mechanisms , 2017 .
[4] M. Bumin Yenmez,et al. Manipulability of Stable Mechanisms , 2015 .
[5] Ronald M. Harstad,et al. Information Impact and Allocation Rules in Auctions with Affiliated Private Values: A Laboratory Study , 1987 .
[6] Peter Troyan,et al. Obviously Strategyproof Implementation of Allocation Mechanisms , 2017 .
[7] A. Roth. The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics , 2002 .
[8] Ilya Segal,et al. Deferred-acceptance auctions and radio spectrum reallocation , 2014, EC.
[9] Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al. School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach , 2003 .
[10] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Changing the Boston School Choice Mechanism , 2006 .
[11] Alex Rees-Jones,et al. Suboptimal Behavior in Strategy-Proof Mechanisms: Evidence from the Residency Match , 2016, Games Econ. Behav..
[12] Avinatan Hassidim,et al. "Strategic" Behavior in a Strategy-proof Environment , 2016, EC.
[13] Thayer Morrill,et al. Identifying the Harm of Manipulable School-Choice Mechanisms , 2018 .
[14] Yan Chen,et al. School Choice : An Experimental Study ∗ , 2004 .
[15] R. Hakimov,et al. The Iterative Deferred Acceptance Mechanism , 2016, Games Econ. Behav..
[16] Rafail Ostrovsky,et al. A Stable Marriage Requires Communication , 2014, SODA.
[17] Lars Ehlers,et al. Strategy-proof assignment on the full preference domain , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.
[18] Nicole Immorlica,et al. Marriage, honesty, and stability , 2005, SODA '05.
[19] Sophie Bade,et al. Gibbard-Satterthwaite Success Stories and Obvious Strategyproofness , 2016, EC.
[20] Flip Klijn,et al. Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment , 2019, Games Econ. Behav..
[21] Parag A. Pathak,et al. The Boston Public School Match , 2005 .
[22] D. Gale,et al. Multi-Item Auctions , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.
[23] H. Ergin. Efficient Resource Allocation on the Basis of Priorities , 2002 .
[24] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Strategy-Proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match , 2009 .
[25] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Appendix to "Incentives and Stability in Large Two-Sided Matching Markets" , 2009 .
[26] Noam Nisan,et al. Economic efficiency requires interaction , 2013, STOC.
[27] M. Pycia,et al. Obvious Dominance and Random Priority , 2019, EC.
[28] Ilya Segal,et al. The communication requirements of social choice rules and supporting budget sets , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.
[29] Jacob D. Leshno,et al. Unbalanced Random Matching Markets: The Stark Effect of Competition , 2017, Journal of Political Economy.
[30] David Gale,et al. Ms. Machiavelli and the Stable Matching Problem , 1985 .
[31] Ran I. Shorrer,et al. Obvious Mistakes in a Strategically Simple College Admissions Environment , 2017 .
[32] M. Braverman,et al. Communication Requirements and Informative Signaling in Matching Markets , 2017, EC.
[33] David A. Freedman,et al. Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley Algorithm , 1981 .
[34] A. Roth. The Evolution of the Labor Market for Medical Interns and Residents: A Case Study in Game Theory , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.
[35] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Leveling the Playing Field: Sincere and Sophisticated Players in the Boston Mechanism , 2008 .
[36] L. S. Shapley,et al. College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..
[37] R. Hakimov,et al. Iterative versus Standard Deferred Acceptance: Experimental Evidence , 2018, The Economic Journal.