Vibration-based damage identification: the Z24 benchmark

[1]  D. Bernal.  Load Vectors for Damage Localization , 2002 .

[2]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  Output-only structural health monitoring in changing environmental conditions by means of nonlinear system identification , 2014 .

[3]  Bart Peeters,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MODAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR BRIDGE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS , 2003 .

[4]  G. Roeck,et al.  Structural damage identification of the highway bridge Z24 by FE model updating , 2004 .

[5]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification , 2008 .

[6]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge : environmental effects versus damage events , 2001 .

[7]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  The Local Flexibility method for Vibration-based damage localization and quantification , 2008 .

[8]  G. De Roeck,et al.  DESCRIPTION OF Z24 BENCHMARK , 2003 .

[9]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Reference-based combined deterministic–stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis , 2006 .

[10]  E. Parloo,et al.  Maximum likelihood identification of non-stationary operational data , 2003 .

[11]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Combined Experimental-Operational Modal Testing of Footbridges , 2010 .

[12]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Damage identification on the Z24-bridge using vibration monitoring analysis , 2000 .

[13]  You-Lin Xu,et al.  Temperature effect on vibration properties of civil structures: a literature review and case studies , 2012 .

[14]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison , 2012 .