An optimized transient technique and flow modeling for laboratory permeability measurements of unconventional gas reservoirs with tight structure

Abstract Considering the significance of pressure-dependent-permeability in characterizing fluid flow and production from gas reservoirs and the inaccuracy of the conventional transient technique in laboratory permeability measurements of core samples from unconventional reservoirs with tight structure and strong sorption potential, the conventional transient technique is optimized by using two equal-sized gas reservoirs mounted in the up and downstream sides of the experimental setup and creating same magnitude of pressure pulses in each reservoir concurrently. Applicability of the optimized transient technique is examined through both numerical simulation and laboratory tests. A mathematical model is firstly developed to numerically investigate fluid flow behavior in time and space domain. The results from numerical simulation showed that the optimized technique can greatly improve the efficiency and accuracy of the measurement, because a steady flow state as a function of time can be achieved much faster in comparison with the conventional transient technique when the same magnitude of initial pressure difference is established between the two ends of the sample. Given the difference in experimental design and procedures between the conventional and the optimized technique, it is questionable whether currently used analytical solutions developed for the conventional technique for permeability calculation can be applied for the optimized technique. Therefore, an analytical solution, corresponding to the optimized transient technique, has been then theoretically derived. It is finally experimentally verified that accurate permeability results can be obtained based on late-time pressure responses by the derived analytical solution. The optimized experimental method is capable of extending the application of the transient technique into permeability measurements of rocks with tight structure and strong gas sorption potential, providing a more reliable approach for laboratory permeability tests.

[1]  Regina Sander,et al.  Laboratory measurement of low permeability unconventional gas reservoir rocks: A review of experimental methods , 2017 .

[2]  Yajun Li,et al.  A method for determining transverse permeability of tight reservoir cores by radial pressure pulse decay measurement , 2016 .

[3]  A. I. Dicker,et al.  A Practical Approach for Determining Permeability From Laboratory Pressure-Pulse Decay Measurements , 1988 .

[4]  J. Bear.  Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[5]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Laboratory characterisation of coal reservoir permeability for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery , 2010 .

[6]  J. D. Bredehoeft,et al.  A Transient Laboratory Method for Determining the Hydraulic Properties of "Tight"Rocks-I, Theory , 1981 .

[7]  R. M. Bustin,et al.  Measurements of gas permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different approaches and their applications , 2009 .

[8]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Laboratory measurement and modeling of coal permeability with continued methane production: Part 1 – Laboratory results , 2012 .

[9]  Yajun Li,et al.  A modified pressure-pulse decay method for determining permeabilities of tight reservoir cores , 2015 .

[10]  S. C. Jones.  A Technique for Faster Pulse-Decay Permeability Measurements in Tight Rocks , 1997 .

[11]  Carl H. Sondergeld,et al.  Measuring low permeabilities of gas-sands and shales using a pressure transmission technique , 2011 .

[12]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Optimized pressure pulse-decay method for laboratory estimation of gas permeability of sorptive reservoirs: Part 1 – Background and numerical analysis , 2017 .

[13]  Jairam Kamath,et al.  Characterization of Core Scale Heterogeneities Using Laboratory Pressure Transients , 1992 .

[14]  Ian D. Palmer,et al.  How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model , 1998 .

[15]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  Permeability of granite under high pressure , 1968 .

[16]  Hui Wang,et al.  A new approach for measuring the permeability of shale featuring adsorption and ultra-low permeability , 2016 .

[17]  A. Nur,et al.  Permeability measurement by the pulse-decay method: Effects of poroelastic phenomena and non-linear pore pressure diffusion , 1986 .

[18]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Optimized pressure pulse-decay method for laboratory estimation of gas permeability of sorptive reservoirs: Part 2 - Experimental study , 2017 .