Recovery Strategies for Heavy Metal-Inhibited Biological Nitrogen Removal from Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Review

Biological nutrient removal is an integral part of a wastewater treatment plant. However, the microorganism responsible for nutrient removal is susceptible to inhibition by external toxicants such as heavy metals which have the potential to completely inhibit biological nutrient removal. The inhibition is a result of the interaction between heavy metals with the cell membrane and the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of the cell. Several attempts, such as the addition of pretreatment steps, have been made to prevent heavy metals from entering the biological wastewater systems. However, the unexpected introduction of heavy metals into wastewater treatment plants result in the inhibition of the biological wastewater treatment systems. This necessitates the recovery of the biological process. The biological processes may be recovered naturally. However, the natural recovery takes time; additionally, the biological process may not be fully recovered under natural conditions. Several methods have been explored to catalyze the recovery process of the biological wastewater treatment process. Four methods have been discussed in this paper. These include the application of physical methods, chelating agents, external field energy, and biological accelerants. These methods are compared for their ability to catalase the process, as well as their environmental friendliness. The application of bio-accelerant was shown to be superior to other recovery strategies that were also reviewed in this paper. Furthermore, the application of external field energy has also been shown to accelerate the recovery process. Although EDTA has been gaining popularity as an alternative recovery strategy, chelating agents have been shown to harm the metal acquisition of bacteria, thereby affecting other metabolic processes that require heavy metals in small amounts. It was then concluded that understanding the mechanism of inhibition by specific heavy metals, and understanding the key microorganism in the inhibited process, is key to developing an effective recovery strategy.

[1]  Q. Ren,et al.  Effects of Heavy Metals on the Performance and Mechanism of Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation for Treating Wastewater , 2022, Frontiers in Chemical Engineering.

[2]  S. Rathilal,et al.  A Review of the Techno-Economic Feasibility of Nanoparticle Application for Wastewater Treatment , 2022, Water.

[3]  G. Luo,et al.  Progress on microalgae biomass production from wastewater phycoremediation: metabolic mechanism, response behavior, improvement strategy and principle , 2022, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[4]  Chong-Jian Tang,et al.  Understanding the slight inhibition of high As(III) stress on nitritation process: Insights from arsenic speciation and microbial community analyses. , 2022, Journal of hazardous materials.

[5]  H. Bürgmann,et al.  Microeukaryotic gut parasites in wastewater treatment plants: diversity, activity, and removal , 2022, Microbiome.

[6]  Bao-Cheng Huang,et al.  A review of heavy metals inhibitory effects in the process of anaerobic ammonium oxidation. , 2022, Journal of hazardous materials.

[7]  R. Nerenberg,et al.  Effects of eukaryotic predation on nitrifying MABR biofilms. , 2021, Water research.

[8]  C. Yuan,et al.  Effective restoration of partial nitritation and anammox biofilm process by short-term hydroxylamine dosing: Mechanism and microbial interaction. , 2021, Bioresource technology.

[9]  Ya-Fei Cheng,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of the long-term effect of Cu2+ on denitrifying granular sludge and feasibility of in situ recovery by phosphate. , 2021, Journal of hazardous materials.

[10]  Xiaolei Zhang,et al.  A review of research progress of heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification microorganisms (HNADMs). , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Jiangkun Du,et al.  Application of electric fields to mitigate inhibition on anammox consortia under long-term tetracycline stress. , 2021, Bioresource technology.

[12]  B. R. Gurjar,et al.  An integrated approach for phycoremediation of municipal wastewater and production of sustainable transportation fuel using oleaginous Chlorella sp. , 2021, Journal of Water Process Engineering.

[13]  K. Agrawal,et al.  Phycoremediation of nitrogen and phosphate from wastewater using Picochlorum sp.: A tenable approach , 2021, Journal of basic microbiology.

[14]  Qian Wang,et al.  Application of different redox mediators induced bio-promoters to accelerate the recovery of denitrification and denitrifying functional microorganisms inhibited by transient Cr(VI) shock. , 2021, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  Nian-Si Fan,et al.  Deciphering the response of anammox process to heavy metal and antibiotic stress: arsenic enhances the permeability of extracellular polymeric substance and aggravates the inhibition of sulfamethoxazole , 2021 .

[16]  Mahesh Kumar Joshi,et al.  Technological trends in heavy metals removal from industrial wastewater: A review , 2021 .

[17]  L. M. Saraiva,et al.  Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Monoxide Tolerance in Bacteria , 2021, Antioxidants.

[18]  E. Heath,et al.  Phycoremediation of municipal wastewater: Removal of nutrients and contaminants of emerging concern , 2021 .

[19]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Utilizing Infrared Electromagnetic Fields to Increase Anammox Activity and Growth Rates , 2021 .

[20]  L. Chai,et al.  Hydroxylamine addition enhances fast recovery of anammox activity suffering Cr(VI) inhibition. , 2021, Bioresource technology.

[21]  Hoang Giang Pham,et al.  Fenton/ozone-based oxidation and coagulation processes for removing metals (Cu, Ni)-EDTA from plating wastewater , 2021 .

[22]  Yingxin Zhao,et al.  Rapid recovery of inhibited denitrification with cascade Cr(VI) exposure by bio-accelerant: Characterization of chromium distributions, EPS compositions and denitrifying communities. , 2021, Journal of hazardous materials.

[23]  S. Vishali,et al.  Application of membrane-based hybrid process on paint industry wastewater treatment , 2021, Membrane-Based Hybrid Processes for Wastewater Treatment.

[24]  Muhammad Abdul Qyyum,et al.  Energy saving anammox technology-based nitrogen removal and bioenergy recovery from wastewater: Inhibition mechanisms, state-of-the-art control strategies, and prospects , 2021 .

[25]  Sarthak Gupta,et al.  Latest trends in heavy metal removal from wastewater by biochar based sorbents , 2020 .

[26]  J. Surmacz-Górska,et al.  Long-term effect of heavy metals Cr(III), Zn(II), Cd(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Pb(II) on the anammox process performance , 2020 .

[27]  O. Okoh,et al.  Heavy Metals in Wastewater and Sewage Sludge from Selected Municipal Treatment Plants in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa , 2020, Water.

[28]  Yongzhen Peng,et al.  Enhanced nutrient removal of simultaneous partial nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal (SPNDPR) in a single-stage anaerobic/micro-aerobic sequencing batch reactor for treating real sewage with low carbon/nitrogen. , 2020, Chemosphere.

[29]  G. Emtiazi,et al.  Generation of non-toxic, chemical functional bio-polymer for desalination, metal removal and antibacterial activities from animal meat by-product , 2020, Journal of Food Science and Technology.

[30]  Thakir D. Al-Momani,et al.  Heavy metal ions removal from industrial wastewater using magnetic nanoparticles (MNP) , 2020 .

[31]  Ş. Ö. Yaman,et al.  Heavy Metal Removal Investigation in Conventional Activated Sludge Systems , 2020 .

[32]  Yongzhen Peng,et al.  A novel strategy for accelerating the recovery of a Fe(II)-inhibited anammox reactor by intermittent addition of betaine: Performance, kinetics and statistical analysis. , 2020, Chemosphere.

[33]  Y. Li,et al.  Towards advanced nitrogen removal and optimal energy recovery from leachate: A critical review of anammox-based processes , 2020, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology.

[34]  Sunja Cho,et al.  Performance of Anammox Processes for Wastewater Treatment: A Critical Review on Effects of Operational Conditions and Environmental Stresses , 2019, Water.

[35]  Yuanyue Wang,et al.  Roles of hydroxylamine and hydrazine in the in-situ recovery of one-stage partial nitritation-anammox process: Characteristics and mechanisms. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  Chi Zhang,et al.  Enhancement of the ANAMMOX bacteria activity and granule stability through pulsed electric field at a lower temperature (16 ± 1 °C). , 2019, Bioresource technology.

[37]  M. Afzal,et al.  Floating treatment wetlands as biological buoyant filters for wastewater reclamation , 2019, International journal of phytoremediation.

[38]  Byong-Hun Jeon,et al.  Algae as a green technology for heavy metals removal from various wastewater , 2019, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[39]  Hang N Nguyen,et al.  Effect of cadmium on the performance of partial nitrification using sequencing batch reactor , 2019, Chemosphere.

[40]  Liang Guo,et al.  Insights into the effect of nickel (Ni(II)) on the performance, microbial enzymatic activity and extracellular polymeric substances of activated sludge. , 2019, Environmental pollution.

[41]  I. Ali,et al.  An overview of heavy metal removal from wastewater using magnetotactic bacteria , 2018 .

[42]  K. Pakshirajan,et al.  Heavy metal removal from aqueous solution using sodium alginate immobilized sulfate reducing bacteria: Mechanism and process optimization. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  Liang Guo,et al.  Performance evaluation and microbial community of a sequencing batch reactor under divalent cadmium (Cd(II)) stress , 2018 .

[44]  Xu-xiang Zhang,et al.  Comparison of the impacts of zinc ions and zinc nanoparticles on nitrifying microbial community. , 2018, Journal of hazardous materials.

[45]  Xuhao Zhao,et al.  Iron Robustly Stimulates Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification Under Aerobic Conditions. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  Yun-guo Liu,et al.  Influence of sodium dodecyl sulfate coating on adsorption of methylene blue by biochar from aqueous solution. , 2017, Journal of environmental sciences.

[47]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Assessment of heavy metal contamination in water of Kali River using principle component and cluster analysis, India , 2018, Sustainable Water Resources Management.

[48]  A. Singhal,et al.  Investigating the nitrification and denitrification kinetics under aerobic and anaerobic conditions by Paracoccus denitrificans ISTOD1. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[49]  Zhiguo Yuan,et al.  Achieving Mainstream Nitrogen Removal through Coupling Anammox with Denitratation. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  G. Zeng,et al.  Nickel toxicity to the performance and microbial community of enhanced biological phosphorus removal system , 2017 .

[51]  Yongyou Hu,et al.  Treatment of Ni-EDTA containing wastewater by electrocoagulation using iron scraps packed-bed anode. , 2016, Chemosphere.

[52]  Rajeev Kumar,et al.  Heavy Metals Contamination in Water and their Hazardous Effect on Human Health-A Review , 2016 .

[53]  B. Pan,et al.  Coupled Cu(II)-EDTA degradation and Cu(II) removal from acidic wastewater by ozonation: Performance, products and pathways , 2016 .

[54]  M. Tekere,et al.  Evaluation of Heavy Metal Removal from Wastewater in a Modified Packed Bed Biofilm Reactor , 2016, PloS one.

[55]  K. Chandran,et al.  Nitrification inhibition by hexavalent chromium Cr(VI)--Microbial ecology, gene expression and off-gas emissions. , 2016, Water research.

[56]  Ji-ti Zhou,et al.  Effects of cycle duration of an external electrostatic field on anammox biomass activity , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[57]  Yingxin Zhao,et al.  Recovery of nitrification in cadmium-inhibited activated sludge system by bio-accelerators. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[58]  S. Okabe,et al.  Anammox-based technologies for nitrogen removal: Advances in process start-up and remaining issues. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[59]  K. Chandran,et al.  Impact of Heavy Metals on Transcriptional and Physiological Activity of Nitrifying Bacteria. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[60]  Ren-Cun Jin,et al.  A novel strategy for accelerating the recovery of an anammox reactor inhibited by copper(II): EDTA washing combined with biostimulation via low-intensity ultrasound , 2015 .

[61]  M. Ranjan,et al.  Heavy Metal Removal from Wastewater Using Low Cost Adsorbents , 2015 .

[62]  Yingxin Zhao,et al.  Nitrification recovery behavior by bio-accelerators in copper-inhibited activated sludge system. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[63]  S. Percival,et al.  EDTA: An Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Agent for Use in Wound Care. , 2015, Advances in wound care.

[64]  Mihone Kerolli-Mustafa,et al.  Assessment of heavy metal contamination in water and sediments of Trepça and Sitnica rivers, Kosovo, using pollution indicators and multivariate cluster analysis , 2015, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[65]  Peifang Wang,et al.  Inhibitory effects of ZnO nanoparticles on aerobic wastewater biofilms from oxygen concentration profiles determined by microelectrodes. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.

[66]  B. Yamina,et al.  Study on Cadmium Resistant-Bacteria Isolated from Hospital Wastewaters , 2014 .

[67]  J. Puhakka,et al.  Effect of arsenic on nitrification of simulated mining water. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[68]  Ji-ti Zhou,et al.  Inhibition and recovery of Anammox biomass subjected to short-term exposure of Cd, Ag, Hg and Pb , 2014 .

[69]  K. Isaka,et al.  Evaluation of inhibitory effects of heavy metals on anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) by continuous feeding tests , 2014, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[70]  Ji-ti Zhou,et al.  Inhibition and recovery of continuous electric field application on the activity of anammox biomass , 2014, Biodegradation.

[71]  C. L. Sodré,et al.  Antimicrobial action of chelating agents: repercussions on the microorganism development, virulence and pathogenesis. , 2012, Current medicinal chemistry.

[72]  V. Ochoa-Herrera,et al.  Toxicity of copper(II) ions to microorganisms in biological wastewater treatment systems. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[73]  P. Madoni Protozoa in wastewater treatment processes: A minireview , 2011 .

[74]  Ji-ti Zhou,et al.  Application of low intensity ultrasound to enhance the activity of anammox microbial consortium for nitrogen removal. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[75]  R. P. Hall Growth-factors for protozoa. , 1943 .