Irrigation Scheduling. I: Integer Programming Approach

This paper shows how a sequential irrigation schedule for a tertiary unit can be interpreted as a single machine scheduling problem with earliness, tardiness, and a common deadline. An integer program solution is presented for this irrigation scheduling problem. Two different models are presented to reflect different management options at the tertiary level. The first model allows jobs to be scheduled noncontiguously. In the second model only contiguous jobs are allowed. The second model has three submodels reflecting the various ways in which contiguous jobs can be scheduled over a fixed interval. Earlier work in determining unit costs of earliness/tardiness is reviewed and an alternative improved method is suggested. The models presented in this paper are applied to a tertiary unit with 16 users, both as a single interval and multi-interval irrigation scheduling problem. An alternative integer program is also presented which although computationally more efficient can only be used for single period scheduling problems. The models developed in this paper can be used to solve small scheduling problems and also to calibrate the heuristics as presented in the companion paper.

[1]  Uttarayan Bagchi,et al.  Minimizing Job Idleness in Deadline Constrained Environments , 1992, Oper. Res..

[2]  Michael Pinedo,et al.  BPSS: A Scheduling Support System for the Packaging Industry , 1993, Oper. Res..

[3]  Gary D. Scudder,et al.  Sequencing with Earliness and Tardiness Penalties: A Review , 1990, Oper. Res..

[4]  C. Santhi,et al.  A new planning model for canal scheduling of rotational irrigation , 2000 .

[5]  Arif A. Anwar,et al.  Irrigation Scheduling Using Mixed-Integer Linear Programming , 2001 .

[6]  Ching-Fang Liaw,et al.  A branch-and-bound algorithm for the single machine earliness and tardiness scheduling problem , 1999, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  Timothy D. Fry,et al.  A BI-criterion approach to minimizing inventory costs on a single machine when early shipments are forbidden , 1987, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  David Abramson,et al.  Scheduling Aircraft Landings - The Static Case , 2000, Transp. Sci..

[9]  Esther M. Arkin,et al.  Weighted-Tardiness Scheduling on Parallel Machines with Proportional Weights , 1991, Oper. Res..

[10]  G. Rinaldi,et al.  Scheduling tasks with sequence-dependent processing times , 1988 .

[11]  Wen-Hwa Yang,et al.  Survey of scheduling research involving setup times , 1999, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[12]  Jatinder N. D. Gupta,et al.  A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations , 1999 .

[13]  A. K. Yadav,et al.  A model for equitable distribution of canal water , 2000, Irrigation Science.

[14]  Narasimha R. Mannur,et al.  Heuristic algorithms for solving earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with machine vacations , 1993 .

[15]  A. A. Bishop,et al.  Irrigation Water Delivery for Equity Between Users , 1983 .

[16]  Muhammad Latif,et al.  Proposal for equitable water allocation for rotational irrigation in Pakistan , 1994 .

[17]  J. Mohan Reddy,et al.  Improved 0–1 programming model for optimal flow scheduling in irrigation canals , 1995 .

[18]  Suresh Chand,et al.  Single machine scheduling to minimize weighted earliness subject to no tardy jobs , 1988 .