Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Croxall,et al. The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[2] R. Boyd,et al. Reciprocity : you have to think different , 2006 .
[3] W. Potts,et al. The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes , 1999, The American Naturalist.
[4] J. A. Farr. MALE RARITY OR NOVELTY, FEMALE CHOICE BEHAVIOR, AND SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE GUPPY, POECILIA RETICULATA PETERS (PISCES: POECILIIDAE) , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[5] S. Washburn. The evolution of man. , 1978, Scientific American.
[6] A. Houde,et al. Possible role of female discrimination against ‘redundant’ males in the evolution of colour pattern polymorphism in guppies , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[7] M. Milinski,et al. Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism , 2001, Nature.
[8] Yoh Iwasa,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[9] D. W. Zeh,et al. Toward a New Sexual Selection Paradigm: Polyandry, Conflict and Incompatibility (Invited Article) , 2003 .
[10] Per Lundberg,et al. Noise colour and the risk of population extinctions , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[11] M. Björklund. Mate choice for indirect benefits displayed by a large ornament: simulations using a neural network , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[12] R. Frankham. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn): by Douglas S. Falconer and Trudy F.C. Mackay Longman, 1996. £24.99 pbk (xv and 464 pages) ISBN 0582 24302 5 , 1996 .
[13] H. Kokko,et al. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.
[14] DIRECT AND INDIRECT SEXUAL SELECTION AND QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MALE TRAITS IN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA) , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[15] A. Magurran,et al. Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy lost its spots , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[16] B. Sinervo,et al. The Developmental, Physiological, Neural, and Genetical Causes and Consequences of Frequency-Dependent Selection in the Wild , 2006 .
[17] J. L. Tomkins,et al. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[18] Ary A. Hoffmann,et al. A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change , 2005 .
[19] D. Falconer. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 1. ed. , 1984 .
[20] G. Parker. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[21] Timothy A Mousseau,et al. Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness , 2004, Nature.
[22] D. Rankin,et al. Can adaptation lead to extinction , 2005 .
[23] C. Lively,et al. Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypes , 2000, Nature.
[24] S. Chenoweth,et al. Orientation of the Genetic Variance‐Covariance Matrix and the Fitness Surface for Multiple Male Sexually Selected Traits , 2004, The American Naturalist.
[25] L. Rowe,et al. Sexual conflict and indirect benefits , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[26] D. McLain. FEMALE SOLDIER BEETLES DISPLAY A FLEXIBLE PREFERENCE FOR SELECTIVELY FAVORED MALE PHENOTYPES , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[27] T. Pitcher,et al. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes , 2004, Molecular ecology.
[28] Robert Olendorf,et al. Frequency-dependent survival in natural guppy populations , 2006, Nature.
[29] Quantifying male attractiveness , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[30] H. Kokko,et al. Unifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection , 2006 .
[31] D. Rankin,et al. Species‐level selection reduces selfishness through competitive exclusion , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[32] Michael D Greenfield,et al. Genotype–environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals , 2004, Animal Behaviour.
[33] T. Tregenza,et al. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding , 2002, Nature.
[34] Linda Partridge,et al. Mating patterns and mate choice , 1984 .
[35] J. Travis,et al. Frequency–dependent numerical dynamics in mosquitofish , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[36] D. Falconer,et al. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .
[37] B. Sinervo,et al. The rock–paper–scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies , 1996, Nature.
[38] A. Magurran,et al. Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies , 1999, Nature.
[39] Bashisth N. Singh,et al. Frequency-dependent selection: minority male mating advantage in Drosophila. , 2000 .
[40] Ulf Dieckmann,et al. Surprising evolutionary predictions from enhanced ecological realism. , 2006, Theoretical population biology.
[41] P. Nosil. Frequency-Dependent Selection: When Being Different Makes You Not Stand out , 2006, Current Biology.
[42] M. Wade,et al. Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod , 1991, Nature.
[43] H. Kokko,et al. Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction , 2003 .
[44] G. Ruxton,et al. Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations , 2003 .
[45] L. Dill,et al. Predation on females or males: who pays for bright male traits? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[46] Kenichi Aoki,et al. Runaway sexual selection with paternal transmission of the male trait and gene-culture determination of the female preference. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.
[47] K. Hughes,et al. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[48] M. Petrie,et al. VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[49] M. Kirkpatrick,et al. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.
[50] S. Merilaita,et al. Frequency‐dependent predation and maintenance of prey polymorphism , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[51] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[52] A. Houston,et al. The sexual selection continuum , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.