A simplified ratcheting limit method based on limit analysis using modified yield surface

Abstract Two effective approaches for obtaining ratchet boundaries of a structure undergoing cyclic loads are presented. The approaches use limit analysis of a structure whose yield surface is modified according to the cyclic load. In the first approach, Uniform Modified Yield (UMY) surface is used. UMY approach reduces the Mises-based cylindrical yield surface by Mises stress of the cyclic stress amplitude. UMY method was slightly conservative, and sometimes overly conservative, especially at high ratio of cyclic load to primary steady load. Conservatism, caused by the assumption that the modified yield surface remains isotropic, is eliminated by considering anisotropic Load Dependent Yield Modification approach, LDYM. This approach reduces yield strength based on relative orientation of steady primary and cyclic stress tensors. This work assumed elastic perfect plastic material behavior, with no strain hardening for both original and modified yield surfaces. Ratchet boundaries of several structures, published in literature, were obtained using UMY and LDYM approaches and verified against published data and results of conventional methods. Numerical procedures for UMY and LDYM approaches are extremely fast relative to conventional numerical schemes, and are not restricted by complex geometry or loading.

[1]  Paolo Fuschi,et al.  Limit analysis for a general class of yield conditions , 2000 .

[2]  Alan R.S. Ponter,et al.  Linear matching method for creep rupture assessment , 2003 .

[3]  A. Ponter.  The analysis of cyclically loaded creeping structures for short cycle times , 1976 .

[4]  S. Karadeniz,et al.  A linear programming upper bound approach to the shakedown limit of thin shells subjected to variable thermal loading , 1984 .

[5]  A. Ponter.  Minimum Theorems and Iterative Solutions Methods for Creep Cyclic Loading Problems , 2001 .

[6]  Alan R.S. Ponter,et al.  Shakedown state simulation techniques based on linear elastic solutions , 1997 .

[7]  Haofeng Chen,et al.  Lower and upper bound limit analyses for pipeline with multi-slots of various configurations , 2000 .

[8]  P. Fuschi,et al.  The shakedown load boundary of an elastic-perfectly plastic structure , 1995 .

[9]  Alan R.S. Ponter,et al.  A general approximate technique for the finite element shakedown and limit analysis of axisymmetrical shells. Part 1: Theory and fundamental relations , 1997 .

[10]  Alan R.S. Ponter,et al.  Shakedown Limits for a General Yield Condition: Implementation and Application for a Von Mises Yield Condition , 2000 .

[11]  Haofeng Chen,et al.  On the solution of limit load and reference stress of 3-D structures under multi-loading systems , 1999 .

[12]  Haofeng Chen,et al.  A method for the evaluation of a ratchet limit and the amplitude of plastic strain for bodies subjected to cyclic loading , 2001 .

[13]  Leone Corradi,et al.  A linear programming approach to shakedown analysis of structures , 1974 .

[14]  Haofeng Chen,et al.  A minimum theorem for cyclic load in excess of shakedown, with application to the evaluation of a ratchet limit , 2001 .

[15]  Philip G. Hodge,et al.  Limit Analysis of Structures at Thermal Cycling , 1980 .

[16]  J. Bree.  Elastic-plastic behaviour of thin tubes subjected to internal pressure and intermittent high-heat fluxes with application to fast-nuclear-reactor fuel elements , 1967 .

[17]  Alan R.S. Ponter,et al.  Limit state solutions, based upon linear elastic solutions with a spatially varying elastic modulus , 1997 .

[18]  Alan R.S. Ponter,et al.  A general approximate technique for the finite element shakedown and limit analysis of axisymmetrical shells. Part 2: Numerical applications , 1997 .

[19]  W. J. O’Donnell,et al.  Upper bounds for accumulated strains due to creep ratcheting , 1974 .