Managing quality heterogeneity in the mango supply chain: evidence from Costa Rica

Quality is a key aspect for evaluating the performance of commodity chains. Quality performance depends on both subjective consumer perceptions as well as intrinsic attributes of the product. Supply chain procedures and management activities influence the quality level and may reduce or increase the heterogeneity in product quality. In additional to technological measures, timely access to information on market and management options can be helpful to reduce human-related variability. In this article we present an explorative framework for disentangling the interactions between different managerial activities that have an effect on quality variability in mangoes. We use data dispersion statistics to understand the impact of technological and socio-economic factors on heterogeneity in quality performance at different stages of the supply chain. Based on a field survey amongst 51 different agents involved in the mango chain from Costa Rica, information regarding production technologies, agroecological conditions, management intensity, quality control, contracting practices and marketing operations is collected. We also tested randomly 10 mangoes from each agent to analyze the variability in quality attributes, focusing on the ratio between Brix and pH. We find that quality heterogeneity is influenced both by technological variability and by socio-economic diversity. In the mango supply chain from Costa Rica, management differences amongst agents vary depending on the upstream and downstream relationships. Agents related to international traders tend to maintain lowest variability in their management practices in order to be able to respond better to consumer demands. Effective linkages with downstream agents are thus critical to guarantee appropriate incentives for managing quality in upstream segments.

[1]  Pieternel A. Luning,et al.  A techno-managerial approach in food quality management research , 2006 .

[2]  Shyam Narayan Jha,et al.  Physical and mechanical properties of mango during growth and storage for determination of maturity , 2006 .

[3]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Empirical Bayes Meta-Analysis , 1985 .

[4]  R. L. Shewfelt.  Defining and meeting consumer requirements , 2006 .

[5]  Vincent K. Chong,et al.  Total quality management, market competition and organizational performance , 2004 .

[6]  Ratapol P. Teratanavat,et al.  Recall event timing: Measures of managerial performance in U.S. meat and poultry plants , 2005 .

[7]  Adopted August,et al.  Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Principles and Application Guidelines †. , 1998, Journal of food protection.

[8]  Z. Schmilovitch,et al.  Determination of mango physiological indices by mechanical wave analysis , 1999 .

[9]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  M. V. Boekel,et al.  Economic incentives for improving mango quality in Costa Rica , 2008 .

[11]  Jennifer Bair,et al.  Global commodity chains and endogenous growth: Export dynamism and development in Mexico and Honduras , 2006 .

[12]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[13]  A. Field.  Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. , 2000 .

[14]  A. Blackman.  Why Don't Lenders Finance High‐Return Technological Change in Developing‐Country Agriculture? , 2001 .

[15]  Maarten Hertog,et al.  The effects of temperature and senescence on the accumulation of reducing sugars during storage of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers: A mathematical model , 1997 .

[16]  J. Hobbs.  VERTICAL LINKAGES IN AGRI-FOOD SUPPLY CHAINS IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES , 2001 .

[17]  K. Tan,et al.  Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance , 2005 .

[18]  R. Schouten,et al.  Keeping quality of cucumber fruits predicted by biological age , 1997 .

[19]  Robert L. Shewfelt,et al.  Measuring Quality and Maturity , 2009 .

[20]  Gary Gereffi,et al.  Global Production Systems and Third World Development. , 1995 .

[21]  Pieternel A. Luning,et al.  Food quality management: a techno-managerial approach. , 2002 .

[22]  S. Sharp,et al.  Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. , 1999 .

[23]  G. Gereffi.  The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How U.S. Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks. , 1994 .

[24]  W. Leonard,et al.  Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of variation in food and nutrient intake in an Andean community. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[25]  S. Ponte.  The 'Latte Revolution'? Regulation, Markets and Consumption in the Global Coffee Chain , 2002 .

[26]  Wim Pelupessy,et al.  Governing the coffee chain: The role of voluntary regulatory Systems , 2005 .

[27]  J. Baerdemaeker,et al.  A methodological approach for the identification and quantification of sources of biological variance in postharvest research , 2006 .

[28]  Peter Gibbon,et al.  Value-Chain Governance, Public Regulation and Entry Barriers in the Global Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Chain into the EU , 2003 .

[29]  R. Schouten,et al.  Batch variability and cultivar keeping quality of cucumber , 2004 .

[30]  David A. Garvin,et al.  Product quality: An important strategic weapon , 1984 .

[31]  G. Glass.  Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[32]  P. Gibbon.  The African Growth and Opportunity Act and the Global Commodity Chain for Clothing , 2003 .

[33]  L. Tijskens,et al.  Biological Variance, Burden or Benefit , 2003 .

[34]  E. Cittadini,et al.  Sweet cherry quality in the horticultural production chain , 2006 .