Tumor Microvessel Density as a Prognostic Marker in High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated on ECOG-ACRIN E2805

Purpose: Increased vascularity is a hallmark of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Microvessel density (MVD) is one measurement of tumor angiogenesis; however, its utility as a biomarker of outcome is unknown. ECOG-ACRIN 2805 (E2805) enrolled 1,943 resected high-risk RCC patients randomized to adjuvant sunitinib, sorafenib, or placebo. We aimed to determine the prognostic and predictive role of MVD in RCC. Experimental Design: We obtained pretreatment primary RCC nephrectomy tissues from 822 patients on E2805 and constructed tissue microarrays. Using quantitative immunofluorescence, we measured tumor MVD as the area of CD34-expressing cells. We determined the association with disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), treatment arm, and clinicopathologic variables. Results: High MVD (above the median) was associated with prolonged OS for the entire cohort (P = 0.021) and for patients treated with placebo (P = 0.028). The association between high MVD and OS was weaker in patients treated with sunitinib or sorafenib (P = 0.060). MVD was not associated with DFS (P = 1.00). On multivariable analysis, MVD remained independently associated with improved OS (P = 0.013). High MVD correlated with Fuhrman grade 1–2 (P < 0.001), clear cell histology (P < 0.001), and absence of necrosis (P < 0.001) but not with gender, age, sarcomatoid features, lymphovascular invasion, or tumor size. Conclusions: High MVD in resected high-risk RCC patients is an independent prognostic, rather than predictive, biomarker of improved OS. Further studies should assess whether incorporating MVD into clinical models will enhance our ability to predict outcome and if low MVD can be used for selection of high-risk patients for adjuvant therapy trials. Clin Cancer Res; 24(1); 217–23. ©2017 AACR.

[1]  R. Motzer,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant pazopanib versus placebo after nephrectomy in patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (PROTECT). , 2017 .

[2]  Shenhong Wu,et al.  New treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with prior anti-angiogenesis therapy , 2017, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[3]  R. Figlin,et al.  Adjuvant treatment for renal cell carcinoma: do we finally have a major breakthrough? , 2016, Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O.

[4]  H. Baker Sunitinib as adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma. , 2016, The Lancet Oncology.

[5]  J. Patard,et al.  Adjuvant Sunitinib in High-Risk Renal-Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Manola,et al.  Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[7]  J. Cheville,et al.  Evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association renal cell carcinoma surveillance guidelines. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  R. Camp,et al.  Microvessel area as a predictor of sorafenib response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma , 2014, Cancer Cell International.

[9]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Expression of Drug Targets in Patients Treated with Sorafenib, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Dawei Li,et al.  Microvessel density and heparanase over-expression in clear cell renal cell cancer: correlations and prognostic significances , 2011, World journal of surgical oncology.

[11]  T. Wilt,et al.  Targeted therapy for advanced renal cell cancer (RCC): a Cochrane systematic review of published randomised trials , 2011, BJU international.

[12]  A. Belldegrun,et al.  Tumor biology and prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma. , 2011, The oncologist.

[13]  M. Brunelli,et al.  The ‘Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis’ score is more accurate than the University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System for predicting cancer‐specific survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma , 2009, BJU international.

[14]  M. Sznol,et al.  Classification of renal cell carcinoma based on expression of VEGF and VEGF receptors in both tumor cells and endothelial cells , 2008, Laboratory Investigation.

[15]  T. Jang,et al.  Survival rates after resection for localized kidney cancer: 1989 to 2004 , 2008, Cancer.

[16]  T. Jang,et al.  Survival rates after resection for localized kidney cancer: 1989 - 2004 , 2008 .

[17]  Y. Kluger,et al.  Expression patterns and prognostic value of Bag-1 and Bcl-2 in breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[18]  F. Goze,et al.  Relation of microvessel density with microvascular invasion, metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma , 2008, BJU international.

[19]  Francesca Demichelis,et al.  Automated immunofluorescence analysis defines microvessel area as a prognostic parameter in clear cell renal cell cancer. , 2007, Human pathology.

[20]  K. Grankvist,et al.  Evaluation of CD31 (PECAM-1) Expression Using Tissue Microarray in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2007, Tumor Biology.

[21]  N. Rioux-Leclercq,et al.  Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma , 2007, Cancer.

[22]  Bin Tean Teh,et al.  Two Distinct Types of Blood Vessels in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Have Contrasting Prognostic Implications , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor–Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Receptors 1 and 2 in Melanoma , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  M. Schumacher,et al.  Prognostic and Predictive Effects of Immunohistochemical Factors in High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer Patients , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  M. Egawa,et al.  Inverse correlation of microvessel density with metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma , 2004, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[26]  J. Cheville,et al.  An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[27]  D. Rimm,et al.  Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[28]  P. Hahnfeldt,et al.  Clinical application of antiangiogenic therapy: microvessel density, what it does and doesn't tell us. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[29]  N. Rioux-Leclercq,et al.  Clinical significance of cell proliferation, microvessel density, and CD44 adhesion molecule expression in renal cell carcinoma. , 2001, Human pathology.

[30]  R. Figlin,et al.  Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  J. Folkman,et al.  Effect of antiangiogenic therapy on slowly growing, poorly vascularized tumors in mice. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  Alamdari,et al.  Follow‐up guidelines for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma based on the occurrence of metastases after radical nephrectomy , 1999, BJU international.

[33]  O. Nativ,et al.  Clinical significance of tumor angiogenesis in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. , 1998, Urology.

[34]  B. Delahunt,et al.  Prognostic significance of microscopic vascularity for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. , 1997, British journal of urology.

[35]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma: lack of prognostic significance. , 1995, Urology.

[36]  K. Okada,et al.  PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MICROVESSEL COUNT IN LOW STAGE RENAL CELL CARCINOMA , 1995, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[37]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2017 , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[38]  Y. Kluger,et al.  HSP90 as a marker of progression in melanoma. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[39]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.